Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon Man Fined $500 for ‘Unlawful’ Study That Found Yellow Stoplights Are Too Short
HeatStreet ^ | April 27, 2017 | Lukas Mikelionis

Posted on 04/27/2017 2:34:41 PM PDT by artichokegrower

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: Steve_Seattle

Do philosophers report to state licensing boards?


41 posted on 04/27/2017 3:54:46 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

It would be interesting to see how the timing of the yellow signal in Oregon compares with the timing in California which is specified by the state and is determined by the speed limits on the roads at the traffic signal. The higher the speed limit, the longer the time required for the yellow signal. I have lived in CA for 47 years and never experienced a traffic signal with a too short a time period.

When traffic signal cameras were installed in many California municipalities, the length of the yellow signal was decreased by some of the companies that installed and operated the cameras. As a result, lawsuits were filed, the major one being in San Diego, and quite a few of the municipalities removed the cameras.


42 posted on 04/27/2017 3:55:07 PM PDT by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Why do they call these states liberal when they are as illiberal as can be?


43 posted on 04/27/2017 4:06:07 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Because commies lie ... that’s what they do ...


44 posted on 04/27/2017 4:12:04 PM PDT by bankwalker (groupthink is dangerous ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DFG

It’s when you spell “Engineer” correctly, with a capital “E”, and sign your name other than with an “X” mark that you have to pay for a license for the privilege of rising above the herd. All he had to do to escape this criminal accusation was to present his data as a statistician rather than a an “Engineer.”


45 posted on 04/27/2017 4:16:03 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

There was a Moscow man who did a study on Stalin and found out that he only had one nut.

Stalin shot the guy.

5.56mm


46 posted on 04/27/2017 4:21:14 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vineyard

The Federal Internal Revenue Service has a job title known as “engineer”. Are those folks operating outside of Oregon law?


47 posted on 04/27/2017 4:25:23 PM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

.
Unless he charged money for his study, he didn’t break any law.

This is a violation of free speech.
.


48 posted on 04/27/2017 4:27:36 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG
He contends state law and the board’s actions that disallow anyone from using the word “engineer” if they’re not an Oregon-licensed professional engineer

If he called himself a professional engineer (a PE), implying that he had gone through the certification process, then I would agree with the board. If he simply called himself an engineer, then I think that the board is way out of line. In my profession, most anyone can call themselves an accountant if they have any training in accounting or hold an accounting-related job but they cannot call themselves a CPA without having gone through the certification process.

The term engineer is a pretty generic term which someone who holds an engineering degree should be able to use. BTW are the people who run trains allowed to call themselves engineers in Oregon?

49 posted on 04/27/2017 4:32:07 PM PDT by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of incompetence and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

This is tyranny, an abuse of government to threaten and intimidate legitimate complaints.


50 posted on 04/27/2017 4:37:14 PM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disestablishmentarian
Denver did the most stupid thing possible on the I-25 through downtown.

They created a lane that went south in the morning and north in the evening.

The only problem is that in order to make absolutely certain that no car went the wrong way at the wrong time, they had to surround it with lots of concrete with lots of controls for ingress and egress.

Basically they created a two-lane wide lane that went in only one direction.

They could have saved a lot of money and hassle if they had just added a new lane to each side of the freeway.

What idiots!

51 posted on 04/27/2017 4:39:34 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

He could have gone there saying he wuz a rednek injuneer.


52 posted on 04/27/2017 4:41:34 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

“If I said what I think should be done to some of these Oregon bureaucrats, I’d have the FBI at my door.”

If there were any sense left in this country the FBI would show up at your door offering to HELP!


53 posted on 04/27/2017 4:43:23 PM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“If I presented an opinion on a legal matter and I identified myself as a lawyer in my correspondence with the governing body I was dealing with, you can be damn sure that the state bar association would have a problem with it (and rightfully so) if I wasn’t really a lawyer. “

You are confusing ambiguous reference to credentials with the commission of prohibited acts.

Generally the law prohibits “the unauthorized PRACTICE of [engineering, law]. Stating “I am a [lawyer, engineer, doctor] and this is what I think about what you are doing” even if you were not licensed, when you hadn’t actually done anything, and weren’t hired by anyone and weren’t purporting to represent anyone other than yourself, is not the practice of anything.


54 posted on 04/27/2017 4:43:25 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Sounds like city hall putting itself first Just Because.


55 posted on 04/27/2017 4:43:44 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

Then Oregon might want to do something about all those Custodial Engineers they have cleaning their offices every night.

https://www.salaryexpert.com/salary/job/custodial-engineer/united-states/connecticut/portland


56 posted on 04/27/2017 4:46:21 PM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

“It’s when you spell “Engineer” correctly,”

Uh, that’s the first clue you’re dealing with a fake.


57 posted on 04/27/2017 4:47:18 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Flash Bazbeaux; Alberta's Child

The response of the Board was illiberal. They might have corrected his language, if it was wrong at all, without being penalizing Philadelphia lawyers about it. The right to complain about how bad their engineering was, is still sacrosanct. I think they, not our amateur engineer, picked the wrong hill to die on.


58 posted on 04/27/2017 4:49:44 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Flash Bazbeaux
You are confusing ambiguous reference to credentials with the commission of prohibited acts.

I don't think so. We had a lengthy conversation on this subject on a different thread last night. The language of some state statutes is very specific about this ... to the point where my company's legal department did a thorough review of all the laws and regulations in the states where we operate, and had the company even change many job titles and descriptions of our capabilities in some of our marketing materials.

I had a lawyer friend tell me that he refuses to even give out one of his business cards in a state where he is not licensed to practice law.

I don't think this guy should be fined $500 for what he did, but I understand that he may have previously been warned with a "cease and desist" letter from the Oregon licensing board.

59 posted on 04/27/2017 4:57:05 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

But it may have been so broad and vague as to challenge his very right to challenge engineers by whatever definition.


60 posted on 04/27/2017 4:58:53 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson