A very high price is paid for free education. Why would parents agree to sending their kids to public edujamacaton?
>
A very high price is paid for free education. Why would parents agree to sending their kids to public edujamacaton?
>
1) It’s not ‘free’
2) It’s NOT ‘education’
RE: the high price is paid, I suspect you mean the taxes stolen for a service (some) used for a limited amount of time but will be paid indefinitely?
As for the WHY, I believe the above statement is the answer: it’s already ‘paid’ for, why not use it. Plus, taxed to the hilt, parents have little incentive/time/energy/ability to do better.