Posted on 04/13/2017 8:16:42 PM PDT by ErikJohnsky
This redistribution of the world’s wealth is long overdue, and it is not just South Africa where white males own a disproportionate amount of wealth.
...
It is time to wrestle control of the world back from white males, and the first step will be a temporary restriction of the franchise to them.
...
Although this may seem unfair and unjust, allowing white males to continue to call the shots politically and economically, following their actions over the past 500 years, is the greater injustice.
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.co.za ...
Mandella said to keep white people around but now we have the Zuma-Obama idiots
Exactly. We will be black-identified getting affirmative action and destroying competition
This is actually what Obama promoted but go figure the idiots voting for him thinking he was black when he probably had a white supremacist streak in himself from his mother
When Communism and Racism meet...
The good news is that PuffHo still wants white men around to pay all the bills.
Exhibit A to repeal the 19th.
This is greed talking.
It’s not the world’s wealth.
For the most part it is wealth created from ingenuity, hard work, investment, risk taking.
And there is more wealth being created every day.
And even more waiting to be created.
But it’s easier to sit around on your lazy arses whining about racism and The White Boogie Man.
If Mugabe had a son, he would talk like this.
This getting rid of whitey experiment has been tried.
How IS Zimbabwe doing these days?
Better for black people?
Explain in detail how.
Look up a picture of the author. You're closer than you think
Well then I guess its time for white guys to go to war with everyone else then.
And we will win.
Amen. Preach it.
Yeah, it’s scary when this racist pig brings up South African hate and solutions. Would American White men just stand by for slaughter or would they organize and make it too dangerous to mess with them?
My wife and my MIL have been telling me that for years. Women can run for and hold office but they should not be the ones who choose the officeholders.
In the "progressive" view, could this be because Trump has stanched the inflow of non-white "immigrants", i.e., invaders?
Repeal the 16th, 17th, and 19th and we stand a chance of getting the Republic back. The existence of those three together make that an impossible task. Add in several generations of Public Education as we have known it and it is probably not possible under any circumstances short of national breakup.
Those other amendments are annoyances, or rather the fanciful interpretations of them by the judiciary are pestiferous but they are not fundamental to the loss of the Republic. The 17th changed the Federal Government into a National Government and the States into Provinces. The 16th gave the central government control of the assets of the nation and way too much money for a healthy government. The 19th gave the franchise to the half+ of the population that is by and large not concerned with liberty but with security for themselves and their children and with making everyone act nice. Married women, especially with children, tend to be conservative. They have their security. Unmarried women are looking for a husband and the Government will do if the men are unwilling to marry and settle down. More and more that is the case as marriage is made more and more legally disadvantageous to men.
White men strong.
You gonna back that claim up, honeybuns?
That doesn’t matter where it was published. It is the undercurrent thinking of the left worldwide. It’s what they’ve been saying privately since the fifties. This is one of the first times they are open about it.
I guess it’s not “disenfranchisement” when *they* do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.