Posted on 04/13/2017 11:54:43 AM PDT by C19fan
Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa's biggest cities.
If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.co.za ...
That's exactly right and it's already beginning to happen. I'm amazed more whites aren't thinking of their children or grandchildren. All this anti-white hatred now, and whites are still barely the majority. Imagine when we are a minority. When all the police, judges, government workers, etc., are nonwhite, do whites REALLY think they will get a fair shake?
This foolish girl may be writing this as a jest or with some tongue in cheek but make no mistake: the philosophy she follows leads to the proposal she makes as course of nature.
Remember her name.
There’ll come a day...
“God help us if we ever give ‘em the vote!” - Rooster Cogburn
Good to know what the other side really thinks. They need to be exposed.
I think we can give up our right to vote one year after the “others” give up use of anything and everything invented by white men.
Let’s see how that turns out.
No more money for charity, then. Might wind up in the hands of the ‘wrong people’.
The 19th amendment was a mistake.
LOL!
It's really scary to realize that, that is no longer just a sick metaphor. And there seem to be so many of them, multiplying like rabbits hogs.
That also works. They’re intolerant totalitarian bastards.
She needs to make me a sammich before she does the laundry.
These are the people who claim they will do communism differently than Stalin and Mao did. LOL
Such is the mindset of the left.
This is why we have the Second Amendment.
That’s right. They’d eliminate us if they could get away with it. This time the ‘Jews’ are armed.
It sounds like Princess Shelley is having one of her “psychotic episodes”. ROTFL! What a ditz.
Time to change my tagline.
“Shelley Garland is an activist and a feminist and is currently completing an MA degree in philosophy. When she’s not gagging at South Africa’s unique brand of rainbow politics, she’s working on ways to smash the patriarchy.”
Yup. “Cultural appropriation” is bad, right?
It could be time to start showing HufnPuff bloggers what the 2nd Amendment means................
Women: If they didn’t have < expletive deleted > there’d be a bounty on ‘em.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.