Posted on 04/13/2017 11:54:43 AM PDT by C19fan
Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa's biggest cities.
If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.co.za ...
I have a better ides...let them move to the wilderness.
Hey, there, Shelley! You think that white men are violent NOW? Well, just try to seriously deny us the vote and see what happens...you know, just out of curiosity. The reaction that you’d get from pulling a starving tiger’s tail would be very mild in comparison.
These “progressives” (i.e. Communists) are outright losing their minds. LET them continue to publish such drivel...it helps them to lose support.
“White men invented whatever device you used to put out this idiotic screed you bigoted moron.”
White men invented automobiles.
White men invented aircraft.
White men invented toasters.
...dish-washers.
...subways.
...newspapers.
...and so on.
The stupid is strong in this one.
If white men cannot vote, they should pay no taxes.
Let's see how the welfare state flourishes then.
How can she deny the privilege enjoyed by white women as companions to the white men she scorns?
Oh, I can think of another reason.
College, I think.
Amen.
Guess they forgotten 2008
“If white men cannot vote, they should pay no taxes.”
I am quite fond of the notion that, should some entity so rob me of what’s mine, I would be quite content to live self-sufficiency off the land in such a way as my official income would be no more than the “poverty line” (if not $0/yr entirely).
Those who would abuse me yet confiscate my income would soon find no income to confiscate - and yet I would live quite comfortably & contentedly.
>>If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.
Oh please do this! We are millions strong and will vote with Rule 556.
Only married men who are living with the mother of their children should have the vote.
No women. No single men. No childless men. No divorced men.
Efff Them. Come give it a try. I may die but you can be sure I’ll take down a bunch first.
Oh, I have no intention of going anywhere under duress.
That was simply an observation of the power of the philosophy they are up against, and mistakenly think they can take by fiat (considering they have not the force). Theirs is like the old mystical notion that you can gain an animal’s power by eating its heart. Ours is the recognition that stuff only gets done by doing it.
Curious as to this ambig’s stanch on this concerning white women that now “identify” as “men” and vice versa.
No comments section?
Why not?
Ladies and gentlemen, I present the mayor of crazy town....
The DNC platform for the very near future.
We already saw the discssion when they chose that Lenin looking dude to head them up.
LOL usually I cringe at such crude retorts, but given the absolute absurdity of this “woman’s” idea I say yours is the prefect, and just reply.
Such a worthless proposal deserves no more in the way of thought or refutation.
I’m all for it!
Being illegal means I can vote a bunch of times, correct?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.