Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McGruff

Reading the article, there are dueling experts. Other experts say the “accident” theory is plausible.


19 posted on 04/06/2017 3:47:18 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Having the French as a resource is like having a banjo on a fishing trip.


20 posted on 04/06/2017 3:55:00 PM PDT by Huebolt (The FBI used to be the untouchables.ous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
Exactly right.

And I'd note; The Bull-in-the-china-closet, big-mouthed, reckless and uncouth, choice of the American people has yet to fly off the handle and do something rash and poorly thought out. Maybe that's a good thing!

There's several scenarios and groups that might have different agendas (our intelligence corps?) hoping he'll react as he's being played. Let's hope he's seeing this from the best interests of the American People point of view.

33 posted on 04/06/2017 4:35:52 PM PDT by WhoisAlanGreenspan? (Fight elitist journalists; Stop paying them by using their names.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt; piasa
Yes, here are the two competing theories cited in the article:

#1. Aerosolization theory: The expert said the way the agent was dispersed, according to witnesses in the northwestern town of Khan Sheikhun, was consistent with an phenomenon known as aerosolization.

Such an effect can only be caused by a military-grade chemical weapon and cannot be provoked by an accidental explosion, Lepick said.

"When you look at the areas of impact and the way people have been affected, you can see clearly that this is a munition that has been designed to deliver a chemical agent, in other words to produce an explosion, with a high degree of aerosolization," he said.

"In other words, it was the most effective way of dispersing the chemical agent."

If an airstrike had hit a warehouse where the toxic agent was being stored, it would have created a "toxic cloud", but the agent would not have been effectively dispersed into the air, he said.

#2. Explosion theory: However, Julien Legros, a researcher at France's national scientific research centre (CNRS) said he believed the Russian theory was not "out of the question".

He argued that it was theoretically possible that the contents of the toxic agent were stored in the same barrel and an explosion caused by an air strike could have caused a chemical reaction which turned the gas into a toxic gas.

A large part of the substance would have b een destroyed in such a strike, "but if even 10 percent of it had become vapour, that 10 percent would have been deadly".

"If 10 milligrammes is enough to kill a person and you have 10 percent of a tonne, then you have more than enough to kill several hundred people," he said.

54 posted on 04/06/2017 6:49:48 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson