Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul Wants Susan Rice Before Congress (Here it comes)
Breitbart ^ | Ian Mason

Posted on 04/03/2017 5:33:23 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) told reporters Monday afternoon that former Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice “ought to testify under oath” after Bloomberg News’s Eli Lake revealed that, during the presidential transition, she deliberately sought to “unmask” President Donald Trump’s associates from intelligence surveillance.

Paul called the reports that Rice made dozens of requests to learn more about the identities of anonymous people thought to be close to the Trump transition team, inadvertently caught on tape during investigations into foreign persons of intelligence interest, “enormous news.”

“If it is allowed, we shouldn’t be allowing it. I don’t think we should discount how big a deal it is that Susan rice was looking at these,” Paul told the assembled reporters.

The Kentucky Senator then cut to the heart of the growing political fight behind what President Trump has called “wiretapping.”

“She needs to be asked, ‘did President Obama ask her to do this?’ I think she ought to testify under oath on this,” Paul opined.

Paul also tried to tie Monday’s revelations about Rice to the slew of leaks on the topic around the time of the handover of the White House. “I think she should be asked under oath, did she reveal it to the Washington Post?” he asked.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: congress; feinstein; paul; randpaul; rice; susanrice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 next last
To: Avalon Memories

Here is the thing. The Obama administration went after Trump. They did everything in their power to bring Trump down and failed miserably. Trump now has a free shot and this is what is scaring the heck out of the left.

Question is, what will Trump do, who will he go after and will the outcome affect the country’s security?


161 posted on 04/04/2017 5:06:10 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Nuke Bilderberg from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“She needs to be asked, ‘did President Obama ask her to do this?’


What’s the point? She’s a proven liar. She’ll just lie or take the 5th and nothing will be done. Congress has no teeth. Until Comey is gone this is all Kabuki.


162 posted on 04/04/2017 5:36:38 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

And, if she signed the IC ledger to see the records, Exec-Immunity and 5thAmd-protections are forfeited.
(Cletus ain’t no Constitutional lawyer but I calls-them like I sees-them


163 posted on 04/04/2017 5:39:05 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

They’d better get her into “protective custody” or she might just “get dead”.


That would be a positive outcome IMHO.


164 posted on 04/04/2017 5:44:11 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“The Obama administration went after Trump.”

WHO ELSE DID THEY GO AFTER???

If Rice did this to Trump, did they also do it to Bernie?

What about Ted Cruz??

What about Marko?

Since they were unmasking Trump at a time they didn’t think he could win, doesn’t it make sense that they would have gone after ALL OF THE CANDIDATES?


165 posted on 04/04/2017 5:58:06 AM PDT by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Baldwin77
Nah. NOTHING will happen. Repeat: NOTHING will happen.

There are rules for politicians and there are rules for we the people.

Better get used to it - it will save you an ulcer.


Can we cut the negative "NOTHING WILL HAPPEN" crap? What, should we just do - nothing? Lie down and let the DemocRATs succeed?

God, I am so sick of this stinking thinking stupidity!

166 posted on 04/04/2017 6:10:56 AM PDT by COBOL2Java ("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: stanne; All
It’s that third one the last photo.

Yeah...the photo that was seen across the world.

start of a new revolution

you read it first on FR

167 posted on 04/04/2017 6:35:43 AM PDT by spokeshave (In the Thatch Weave,..Trump's Wing Man is Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Unlike under Obama she can be prosecuted now for ignoring a subpoena or lying under oath, if she pleads the fifth then we can call her guilty/hiding something.


168 posted on 04/04/2017 6:40:29 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Trump declares war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“I plead the 5th”.


169 posted on 04/04/2017 6:56:47 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (President Trump makes obammy look like the punk he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Why? She’ll just take the Fifth just like that witch Lois Lerner and nothing will come of it. She can hire an attorney out of the Yellow Pages to help with that.


170 posted on 04/04/2017 7:17:31 AM PDT by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Would prefer her before a jury if possible.


171 posted on 04/04/2017 7:18:34 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Where is the attorney General on all this? Screw Kabuki CONgress, how about a Grand Jury..


172 posted on 04/04/2017 7:44:14 AM PDT by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Correct...No grand Jury...Just CONgress and their photo op hearings. Then Nothing as usual.


173 posted on 04/04/2017 7:47:47 AM PDT by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Rand Paul’s right... put the woman under oath...


174 posted on 04/04/2017 7:47:57 AM PDT by GOPJ (Grow a pair Republicans - USE THE REID OPTION....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
-- Since they were unmasking Trump at a time they didn't think he could win, doesn't it make sense that they would have gone after ALL OF THE CANDIDATES? --

No. Trump is the outsider, the rest of the candidates are "team players." All of them were designated losers, to boot. The last election was supposed to be Jeb v. Hillary, until Trump screwed things up.

175 posted on 04/04/2017 8:05:01 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

She’s lied before...Benghazi


176 posted on 04/04/2017 8:08:54 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Among those cleared to request and consume unmasked NSA-based intelligence reports about U.S. citizens were Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, his CIA Director John Brennan and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch.(from the article).

ALL of the above are suspect and should be questioned. How often was 7 masking done. How many people have been unmasked? A number value wouldn’t be classified. Get them o n the stand imeidately..


177 posted on 04/04/2017 8:10:11 AM PDT by SueRae (An administration like no other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Community organizing on Brando's island?


178 posted on 04/04/2017 8:12:17 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
So what? They could have locked Hillary, Lynch, Rice, and a host of others up by now. Tell me: how many have been indicted so far?

Congress is nothing but a bloviating dog and pony show. I have no faith in either their ability or intent to do the right thing. They could have done that by now.

179 posted on 04/04/2017 8:12:45 AM PDT by 60Gunner (The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Nope. The RAT media is going to continue to ignore it, as evidenced by CNN's instruction to both its reporters and its viewers to ignore the Susan Rice story.

How many opportunities to indict these criminals have we seen muffed by congress since 2013? Lois Lerner comes to mind. As does Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin... the list goes on and on.

When I see these people perp-walked into a federal prison, I'll change my tune. But at this moment, congress as a body is nothing but talk. Never mind the deceitful attempt to force unwanted legislation (i.e. Ryancare) down our throats and refusing to do what the American people call for them to do- REPEAL OBAMACARE.

Congress is the same old swarm of lying, self-interested sewer rats they have always been. So far, they have failed to prove otherwise.

180 posted on 04/04/2017 8:27:04 AM PDT by 60Gunner (The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson