Posted on 03/28/2017 4:49:18 PM PDT by TheConservator
"EVELYN FARKAS: Well I was I was urging my former colleagues and and frankly speaking to people on the hill It was more actually aimed aimed at telling the hill people get as much information as you can get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people who left So it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy. That the Trump folks if they found out how we knew what we knew about their the staff the Trump staff dealing with Russians that they would try to compromise those sources and methods meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence. So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia. So then I had talked to someone like former colleagues and I knew that they were trying to also help get information to the hill. MSNBC MIKE BRZEZINSKI: A lot going on today EVELYN FARKAS: yeah MSNBC MIKE BRZEZINSKI: mark EVELYN FARKAS: That's why you have the leaking "
If only I could believe SOMETHING could come from this. Here’s hoping.
This woman has a PHD. But her bio does not state what her field of expertise is. What was her major?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyn_Farkas
Maybe she just talked too much. She obviously feels very strongly she is on some mission to get some kind of truth out in the open.
But, what evidence of collusion is there?
This appears to be a rationalization for criminal activity.
2 March - that’s three days before DJT’s famous tweets. Explains why she was saying what she did. Before the tweets it was all about the Russia connection. After the tweets it was all about never ever any illegal surveillance.
Yeah it’s headlining all the top news on google /s
Nobody gets excited or looks into this stuff besides us, Treehouse, Breitbart and a few others
It’s great to know what’s going on and hope congress actually or the justice dept actually opens up investigations.
Many here have been sure the Clinton are going to prion since the mid ‘90s.
Come on man.
bookmark
I have zero hope that one thing will come from this. You know the treasonous media will ignore it.
Since obastard first ran for US Senate and was exposed supporting partial birth abortion—beyond NARAL and Planned Parenthood—many of us knew he was truly evil.
Thankfully demoncrats like Evelyn Farkas ovomit and the dreaded hildabeast are not as smart as they are evil.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
President Trump, in order to Make America Great Again we must Make Government Constitutional Again! MGCA 2 MAGA!
This is why the dems are becoming unhinged and asking the people that bring out the info to resign or be investigated themselves. The MSM could really up their ratings about right now if they would start reporting on this and STOP protecting the dems and Obama. They may become repsected again. FOX needs to report it too. They need a little help.
That, my friends is criminal intent. She knew that there was a duty to protect sources and methods and yet she leaked anyway, deliberately.
As I just saying, this proves criminal intent. She indicates a duty to protect sources and methods, but she leaked anyway, which is enough, but it is clear that it was done for political gain.
Yes it is. She comes across like, "It's okay if we do it. . We were doing it because of the awful Russians. . and BTW, we just happened to get "Trump staff dealing with the Russians" as a sidebar. Oh really.
Well Dr. Farkas, how did you get the information on "Trump staff dealing with the Russians?" Can you please explain that to us, under oath? And do you know any of the leakers? Were you one of the leakers? Could you kindly tell us who else was trying to get information to the Hill?
Would love to see Trey Gowdy question her. .
Found this: The Leakers Who Exposed Gen. Flynns Lie Committed Serious and Wholly Justified Felonies Find the leakers!
HA Ha Thanks! I have no idea how much, I know that it’s too much now.
The MSM seems to have a couple anti-Trump themes they cycle through periodically depending on what's going on: David Duke/racism, Russia, Trump's taxes, etc. Their main lines of attack were all outlined in the opposition research file that Wikileaks released.
On Fox news tonight, Brit Hume said there was scant evidence, where scant can be taken to be meager. But is there any, other than imputed circumstantial evidence, such as some Russian computer with Trump corporate computer?
There is NO evidence, right?
By collusion, I mean Trump officials promising payoffs for Russia in exchange for hacking the election in Trump’s favor.
I cannot believe how silly this sounds, as if the Russians actually could do this.
The url: http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2017/03/is-evelyn-farkas-a-felon.html
Sounds like her mouth got her in trouble before.
Mika’s middle name is “ignorance” so that is why she ignored this revelation.
My gut tells me it started before Trump came down the escalator in June, 2015. No excuses needed and then someone said, "Let's have the CIA set it up, get with Clapper and Brennan and make it look like were looking for Russian stuff, or better yet, like the Russians are doing it."
I'm sure Hillary asked Obama to do everything he could to get the goods on Trump, you know, his smoking gun like the MI6 guys story, the big whopper for the media right before the election. My bet is half of D.C. was looking for something on Trump being true believers. I betcha' Hillary saw all this surveillance too. In fact, did it go to her first? What a cesspool.
Fire em' all, let God sort em' out. Drain the Swamp!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.