Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big League: Almost 100 Of The Fastest Growing Counties Broke For Trump
Townhall.com ^ | March 25, 2017 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 03/25/2017 6:50:40 PM PDT by Kaslin

It was a rural uprising—and it looks like it will remain that way for now. We have yet to see the consequences that Republicans will have to deal with concerning their retreat from their promise to repeal and replace Obamacare, but that’s for another day. Out of the 100 fastest growing counties in the country, based on U.S. Census data, 93 broke for Trump. The counties that are usually Democratic bastions have seen a sharp decrease in their populations. Moreover, even in blue states, the fastest growing counties are firmly in the Trump columns. One might say this development is big league (via Lifezette):

The latest population estimates released Thursday by the U.S. Census Bureau make that starkly clear. Of the 100 counties of at least 10,000 residents that had the fastest growth rates from July 2015 to July 2016, 93 voted for President Donald Trump in November. Just six backed Democrat Hillary Clinton. The political leanings of the 100th, Matanuska-Susitna Borough in Alaska, are unclear because that state does not report presidential returns at the county level.

Clinton won 26 of the 100 counties that lost population at the fastest rate. That is a higher share than her performance nationwide, when she carried about 16 percent of counties.

[…]

Even in some blue sates, the fastest growth rates are in Trump counties. Clinton handily carried Washington State and Oregon. But the five counties in those West Coast states that made the top 100 all backed the president.

Yet, the publication did not something that could be ominous for the GOP in future elections. On paper, Dallas, Houston, Austin, San Antonio and El Paso areas will have enough votes to tilt the state leftward, as they’re Democratic bastions of support. So, that’s something to keep on the radar.

The Trump phenomenon firmly has the white working class lockstep behind Trump, a voting bloc that numbers in the tens of millions. While Democrats have long boasted about their demographic advantage, it’s all in areas that don’t matter. So what of tens of thousands of more Democratic voters come out of California? The state was going always going to the Democrats in the Electoral College. The point is we don’t decide our president by popular vote, which has been forgotten by the Left in their ongoing temper tantrum over Trump’s upset win over Hillary Clinton. Liberals thought there would be a Latino surge due to Trump’s rhetoric on the campaign trail. That didn’t happen. Moreover, the lion share of Hispanic voters live in states that aren’t competitive in national elections. We could have a scenario where if the GOP’s grip on the white working class remains this strong, Democrats could be facing an Electoral College nightmare. Yes, they could win the popular vote by a larger margin than Clinton, but still lost the election because the rural counties are able to run up the score thanks to Democratic counties losing their strength statewide.

The Democrats’ path out of the wilderness is staring at them right in the face. It’s reconnecting with white working class voters on jobs, pension protection, and infrastructure. Yet, that means sacrificing the transgender bathroom advocacy, the safe space antics, the political correctness, the endless lectures on race, and putting Black Lives Matter on the backburner. The Left pretty much has to set aside the core tenets of the progressive agenda that’s been dictated by urban-based elites. This is going to be a long road to recovery—and I don’t think liberals want to reach out to a vast group of voters they shun and view with revulsion.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; progressives; redstates; redzones; trump2016

1 posted on 03/25/2017 6:50:40 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We need to have an Electoral College within an Electoral College.

States such as NY, CA, and IL are dominated by the big-cities. I propose that a presidential candidate must win a plurality of counties of that state in order to win that state.

2 posted on 03/25/2017 6:54:19 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Man-made global liberalism is killing the planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bookmark


3 posted on 03/25/2017 6:55:12 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When can we get past rehashing the last election? Can we get on to getting Trump’s agenda passed? ASAP


4 posted on 03/25/2017 6:55:18 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A few years ago the Rats tried to claim that the Republican Party is a regional,”Southern” Party.Today it's clear that the Rat Party is a coastal Party...a handful of northeastern States and the left coast.
5 posted on 03/25/2017 6:57:07 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“The counties that are usually Democratic bastions have seen a sharp decrease in their populations.”

While I LIKE reading that, it just makes me nervous that the LibTards have just taken their show on the road and will be making inroads into my BELOVED Heartland, also known as, ‘Flyover Country.’

Keep them on the coasts where they belong! Can’t we build a WALL or something? ;)


6 posted on 03/25/2017 6:57:41 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ah...but the decaying sludge pits on the east and west coasts managed to count more votes than voters. That’s the Democrat’s traditional winning strategy and why they can’t believe that Trump’s overwhelming turnout beat them.


7 posted on 03/25/2017 6:59:47 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So is it the chicken or the egg?

Does an economically healthy county result in Republican voters?

Or do Republican voters cause an economically healthy county?


8 posted on 03/25/2017 7:02:40 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Can’t we build a WALL or something? ;)

Pray for a Tsunami.


9 posted on 03/25/2017 7:40:06 PM PDT by batterycommander (I learned my Artillery skills from the United States Marines. USNA 65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: batterycommander

I can live with that. ;)


10 posted on 03/25/2017 8:10:51 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Yet, the publication did not something that could be ominous for the GOP in future elections. On paper, Dallas, Houston, Austin, San Antonio and El Paso areas will have enough votes to tilt the state leftward, as they’re Democratic bastions of support. So, that’s something to keep on the radar.”

Texas did not vote for Hillary but Hillary did better in Texas than Obama did in his two elections.

And with the growth of Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and Austin, the state willl continue to be less conservative.


11 posted on 03/25/2017 8:25:59 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Conservative Dem Zell Miller wrote how his party was “a national party no more”. He was from the South and it’s worth noting that had Gore won TN he would have been
elected.Lost his home state!
On election night, the likes of liberal
writer Dan Kennedy were flabbergasted that
the sure thing Hillary landslide was slipping away!


12 posted on 03/26/2017 2:11:38 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

And your rationale for that—other than such a vote going your way?


13 posted on 03/26/2017 2:16:41 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Maybe someone can point this out to our good friend mattie Drudge.


14 posted on 03/26/2017 4:28:26 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
And your rationale for that—other than such a vote going your way?

Have you seen the election maps of CA, IL, and NY?

Mostly red, except the big-cities where the Dems win.

But the majority of the counties in each of those states went for Trump.

15 posted on 03/26/2017 9:56:05 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Man-made global liberalism is killing the planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

As I thought—because such a vote would go your way!

;-)


16 posted on 03/26/2017 9:57:08 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson