Posted on 03/25/2017 3:15:57 PM PDT by Hostage
bkmk
I would say we are all intelligent here, more so than most. Given.
Somehow, some way, we keep getting suckered into believing some “bombshell” will come out like this Montgomery thing, or something else will be revealed on “Friday”...how does this keep happening?
Granted, Drudge isn’t perfect...but it is telling it was NOT on Drudge.
Chatter scares and confounds the enemy. Especially when they know THEY’RE being watched and can’t just go whacking inconvenient people like they’re used to doing for 8 years.
Her show is always like this... badly produced. Just a place for her to rant.
Possibly. Like things were rushed/scrabbled quickly together for a couple of segments.
Yep, I agree. And here’s the problem with this kind of thing. The people who promote these bomshellbreakingnewsomg stories that don’t go anywhere are then able to claim things like. ..see how bad it is, they got to him, they got to Fox, they got to Carl Cameron, to Judge Janine...
I don’t know, but the bs seems to be deep all around.
She’s covering Montgomery. ...county...Maryland
Personally.... I’d rather watch a spelling bee than Judge Jeanine. Let’s just say she has ZERO southern charm.... :)
I disagree. I watch on a regular basis. Something was off, imo, on a couple segments.
You may be right. I was out...just got back! Been on my phone the whole time.
I never mentioned any ‘bombshell’. I called attention to a raw audio that is old but is now coming out in relation to the Freedom Watch lawsuit.
Actually, it was out before but got little exposure. But now Freedom Watch is representing Montgomery and that means it has credibility. If the media won’t pick it up, the court case will get the attention.
FW wins cases. They are thorough in their work. They have turned over the evidence and we can bet they have studied it enough and continue to study it to have solid evidence for the court and to reach out to millions who had felonies committed against them.
Many including me have known about the massive nationwide snooping on everyone. But this is different because this presents the verifiable evidence. If it was not for this verifiable evidence, this would fall in the interesting or suspicious category only.
I dont know Jane. Perhaps we were just expecting too much?
I missed perhaps the most important part of tonight’s story.
Where was it said that the Judge would be discussing Montgomery tonight? Was it just a rumor on social media?
This is probably what he wanted us to see, the man-on-the-street.
Lucy and the football.
I bet if I could find my tin foil helmet the program would make more sense....
A man called George Webb does shows on youtube. He is the one who said Cameron would have this Montgomery story tonight on Judge Janine’s show. Then, for obscure reasons (at least to me) the president tweeted to watch her show tonight. Then it made the rounds on social media...
Agreed. The man on the street was likely the reason behind his tweet.
Though, Judge Janine speaking her mind regarding Ryan was a bonus.
Word sure was out on social media that she was breaking this story tonight.
Do think there is something coming from this, just not yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.