Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Was the Point of Winning the Election?
Townhall.com ^ | March 19, 2017 | Derek Hunter

Posted on 03/19/2017 5:26:57 AM PDT by Kaslin

There is an interesting phenomenon that happens among red state Democrats in the Senate every six years. They suddenly start sounding conservative when their re-election bid approaches.

They talk more conservatively. They act more conservatively. They vote more conservatively, at least until they get re-elected and can go back to holding the Democratic Party line in the Senate.

The same phenomenon happens in the Republican Party. Only last year, the American people called their bluff, put them in power, and now expect them to do what they promised. Republicans are terrified at the prospect.

Politicians are quite good at making promises and coming up with excuses as to why those promises went unfulfilled. “We control only one-half of one-third of the government,” we heard in 2011 as an excuse for why the promise of Obamacare repeal was “impossible.”

In 2015, Republicans were given the Senate, therefore control of one branch of government. The refrain changed to, “No matter what we pass, the president will veto it, and we don’t have the votes to override that veto.”

OK, fine. That’s all true. But the problem was they didn’t even try. Congress has power as a co-equal branch of government, yet no effort was exerted toward the promise on which they campaigned.

So now voters have given a second branch of government to the Republicans, and what do we have?

House Republicans have introduced the “American Health Care Act,” the legislative equivalent of Hangover 2. Hangover 2 was a slightly different version of The Hangover, but aside from the setting, you wouldn’t know the difference.

The biggest problem with the AHCA is it leaves in place the concept that it is the responsibility of the federal government to provide health insurance for Americans who don’t have employer-provided coverage. Aside from changing tax law to allow people in the individual market to buy insurance with pre-tax dollars and allowing for the purchase of insurance across state lines, the federal government has no business in the health insurance game.

A true conservative plan would allow the states to become 50 petri dishes able to experiment with ways to make insurance affordable. Eventually best practices would win out and be adopted by others. But that wouldn’t empower the feds, so we’re talking about subsidies, tax credits and a federal regulatory scheme only slightly less arduous than what currently exists.

There’s plenty of blame for this to go around, but the lion’s share has to rest firmly with Speaker of the House Paul Ryan. He got the opportunity he and his colleagues have been asking for, and he gave us a bill that is only slightly better than the system it seeks to replace. No one hires someone who says, “Make me captain of the Titanic and I’ll make sure it sinks 20 minutes later.” Yet that’s what the Republican plan does.

Seven years they had to come up with an idea, and we get a tweak. For seven years, we were told they knew the way, and we get this.

It’s not as though Republicans are burning up the rest of the agenda, they’ve done next to nothing since Jan. 20. After years of “hurry up,” all we’ve gotten is “wait.”

I get that Republicans are afraid of health policy. As a health policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation a decade ago, I briefed many of them on the issue and saw the terror in their eyes as they waited for just enough information to be able to answer basic questions on an issue they’ve ceded to Democrats for years. But for the last seven years, they’ve sworn they had the answers. So where are the answers? The AHCA is not it.

You don’t have to understand the complexities of health insurance markets and impact of regulations on them to understand the Constitution and the limits it places on the federal government. That shouldn’t be a bridge too far considering they swear an oath to it at the start of every term. One would hope they would’ve read it, if not understood it, before they pledged to defend it.

And you don’t have to be a legislative historian to recognize the idea Republicans have proposed of a “three-pronged approach” is insane when even they acknowledge the second “prong” is regulatory and easily could be reversed by a Democratic administration and the third will be blocked even more easily by a filibuster in the Senate. Republicans swear they need a trident to kill Obamacare when a spear would do. Like a Band-Aid – just rip it out of existence, Senate parliamentarian be damned.

Nearly every member of the Republican caucus campaigned on repealing Obamacare and told voters they were “constitutional conservatives.” Nothing they’ve done since would lead anyone to believe either claim was true.

If there’s positive about the process around the AHCA, it’s that so far it is moving slowly. Unlike Obamacare’s passage, Republicans have been transparent. Unfortunately what they’ve cooked up so far is transparently awful. It’s time to scrap the patch and unleash the free market.

Unless the AHCA is fundamentally transformed to the point states are free to experiment, the market is free to function, and individuals are free to make their own choices, everything we have been told will have been a lie, the whole thing should be scrapped and Obamacare allowed to collapse. Both parties will be blamed, and both parties will be to blame.

A golden opportunity in the cause of liberty will have been squandered because, after seven years of talk, Republicans could not do the one thing they told us they would; the reason they were in the position to disappoint us in the first place. It’s time to start over and do it right – if Speaker Ryan and the rest of Republican leadership actually have it in them to do what they’ve campaigned on.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Kaslin

Donald Trump won the Republican nomination because nobody believed the Republican @ssholes in Washington anymore.


21 posted on 03/19/2017 6:19:19 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HypatiaTaught

But Bush Sr. Was more of a continuation of Reagan vs Dukais

Bill Clinton got to ride on the economy, taxes that Regean set up. Plus price of oil/gas was super cheap in 1990s.

I think the beginning of the divisive political grid lock and the “Clld Civil War” began into the Bill Clinton presidency impeachment.

Why we need a two term Trump and a two term successor as the Dem party goes further left off a cliff as it tries to create a majority out if a bunch of non-white interest groups offering unsustainable free stuff to buy votes


22 posted on 03/19/2017 6:20:02 AM PDT by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Wrong. A true conservative plan would have phased out completely the tax exemption for employer-provided plans, at the rare opportunity they have to do so in tandem with a significant, offsetting, income tax rate cut.

That would have simultaneously improved the clean economic incentive effect of lower income tax rates while getting the healthcare market distortion of employer linked and tax exempt insurance.

Further, not only should health insurance sales across state lines be allowed, but the entire McCarron Ferguson Act that had inhibited such should be repealed.

Finally, the Obamacare federal mandates, from requiring insurers to cover offspring through age 26 (if some want to buy and some want to sell such coverage, great—but a mandate is completely out of order), to cover pre-existing conditions (which larger insurance pools obviate the need for anyway), and to limit risk-based pricing should all be repealed. The feds have no business in this at all.

Does Ryan want to reform Medicaid? Let him do it later in another bill. That Trump has completely rolled on this and is repeating the Ryan lie that they can’t repeal because of reconciliation does not bode well. Unfortunately, it fits all too well with him listening more and more to his top aides and cabinet secretaries who are Democrats:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/inside-trumps-white-house-new-york-moderates-spark-infighting-and-suspicion/2017/03/18/51e3c4d2-0b1c-11e7-a15f-a58d4a988474_story.html?utm_term=.c879398a747e

(Not just Ivanka and Jared and Gary Cohn but more—such as this Dina Powell I don’t think I had even heard of before.)


23 posted on 03/19/2017 6:21:09 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I am not sure paying for Obamacare is the main problem that voters have.

As someone who purchased my own insurance for a number of years (I have recently changed jobs and no longer do so), the problem for me was the disparity between the effects of Obamacare on the self-employed and those in employer provided plans. Quite frankly, the cost of Obamacare became prohibitively expensive for me over a three year period. Health insurance was one of the primary reasons I changed jobs. The employer provided insurance I have now is probably the best I’ve ever had, and I contribute very little to it.

As an aside, I think it grossly unfair that many highly compensated professionals have “Cadillac plans” which pay for things like greatly reduced prescription drug prices and orthodontic work, all of which are completely tax free to the employee.


24 posted on 03/19/2017 6:22:33 AM PDT by independentmind (In te Domine confido non confundar in aeternum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PTBAA

This is true, remember when Boehner was forced out- Repubs got Ryan to run for Majority and Ryan had his conditions for running, etc. The other choice other then Ryan was just as bad. In the end. they chose Ryan.


25 posted on 03/19/2017 6:24:07 AM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Exactly.


26 posted on 03/19/2017 6:25:42 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

Yep.


27 posted on 03/19/2017 6:27:39 AM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

If Trump backs conservatives in primaries against these rinos and is successful in 2018 he will then be able to fully turn this country around.


28 posted on 03/19/2017 6:28:10 AM PDT by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KSCITYBOY
No, you need to find a conservative who can beat him, otherwise you are a RINO.

I have never voted for a demonrat and never will.

29 posted on 03/19/2017 6:28:36 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PTBAA

Excellent point


30 posted on 03/19/2017 6:30:04 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The purpose of the Republican Establishment is to maintain the illusion of there being opposition to socialism, while carefully avoiding real opposition to anything the Democrats really want to do.

There is no real Republican-vs-Democrat fight. The real fight is between the Establishment and the rest of us.


31 posted on 03/19/2017 6:35:42 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s certainly not perfect but the difference in what is and what might’ve been makes one wonder how that question could even be asked.


32 posted on 03/19/2017 6:35:46 AM PDT by arkfreepdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HypatiaTaught

This election, just slowed the destruction of America because not only does Trump have to fight the Dems he has to fight the Repubs who are stabbing him in the back and plotting to either get him impeached, to fail, or make a one term President. He has to fight the State Dept, CIA, FBI, liberal Judges. He has to fight the media. Now has to fight the snowflakes at colleges, Professors, etc.

Obama had tremendous loyalty among his staff, FBI, CIA, State Dept, Judges, media, journalists, college folks, administrators.


33 posted on 03/19/2017 6:37:42 AM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

You can’t have a basketball game unless there are two teams on the court. Unfortunately our side is the Washington Generals....


34 posted on 03/19/2017 6:40:00 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A golden opportunity in the cause of liberty will have been squandered because, after seven years of talk, Republicans could not do the one thing they told us they would

We elect GOP politicians to run, constrain and hopefully shrink the size of the federal government. But, they catch Potomac Fever the moment they come to DC. This is the contagious disease that makes politicians forget why they were elected. There is no recovery from this disease.

They grow increasingly sympathetic with big government programs. They also become intoxicated with their power to spend money.

They quickly become acclimated to the political culture and lavish lifestyle of the DC Beltway crowd. In short order they start focusing on serving a NEW constituency, one that rewards fiscal profligacy, the expansion of government, the reduction of personal liberties, and self aggrandizement. Before long, they are transformed into swamp dwellers.

35 posted on 03/19/2017 6:48:09 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Best comment I’ve seen in a long time. Well done!!!


36 posted on 03/19/2017 6:48:53 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Point of winning was to secure a different direction. My point is similar to the author’s. mac/ryan stand in the way


37 posted on 03/19/2017 6:49:49 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (If America Cared would a moslem cair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ground_fog

Ditto


38 posted on 03/19/2017 6:50:29 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (If America Cared would a moslem cair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PTBAA

Double Dittos


39 posted on 03/19/2017 6:52:01 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (If America Cared would a moslem cair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Triple Dittos


40 posted on 03/19/2017 6:57:15 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (If America Cared would a moslem cair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson