Posted on 03/15/2017 6:32:01 AM PDT by brucedickinson
Asia is of course huge and diverse. If you really want to be "more accurate" then describe them as Pakistani, for example.
It’s not meant to be misleading, because this is a British paper. Therefore, the readers know that “Asian” means Middle Easterner, Pakistani, etc.
And this has certainly been explained often enough on FR.
In any case, the real problem is not being “Asians” - East Indians are “Asians,” also - but being Muslims.
Sounds as if England better prepare for another St Brice’s day before it happens to them.
Caesar would have put them feet-first into giant meat-grinders, added a few live pigs, and then fed the result to other pigs. Then, the excrement could have been sent back to the families for burial
When I grew up freeper kids
1960s and 70s
Mongolioid raced folks like Japs and Korean and Chinese and Viets and all this hybrids like Thai and Indonesian and Filipino and Malay and so forth
Anyone with relatively the common eye structure from Mongolia to the Mekong were ORIENTALS
Pakistanis and Indians and Afghan and so forth east of the Persian Gulf were Asian
Although not always completely accurate it worked
It was far more accurate than this blanket term Asian for anyone east of the Urals and west of Honolulu
But no someone Ivy League pinhead in the 80s or so decided since Oriental was also used to describe eastern cultural stuff like food and furniture and music etc that it was racist to use a cultural label as a racial label
Of course out of the other side of their mouth they claim race isn’t correct anyhow
But now everyone not white or black is Asian or maybe indigenous peoples
It’s all political and illogical
So I still say oriental
I have a Mongolian wife and a Chinese adoptee in my extended family
They do not care if their race or ethnic peoples are termed Oriental
Cousin married to a Mongolian
My wife is foreign born too
The Oort Cloud
Good post
Tell me again why ‘guns’ is bad.
Tell us why we shouldn’t carry.
I keep fergetting.
I think that video is from Britannia
They’ve lost their way
“Racial abuse” applies if a minority uses a slur against a white. “Hate crime” applies if a white uses a slur against a minority.
The difference is that you can be thrown in jail for a hate crime, but never for racial abuse.
If the are Pakistanis, they are neither “Middle Eastern” nor “Arab.” Same goes for Iranians.
In either case, Muslim is a pretty good guess, though
Fake news. Asians can’t be racist because they are not white.
How about “Arabic”?
That’s CERTAINLY better than “Asian”
Those aren’t the “refugees”. They’ve been there for decades. The ones shown could be 3rd generation. My point: the problem goes much, much deeper that the current “refugee” influx - of which the UK took very few anyway.
“Asian.”
Mustn’t identify them as Moslems.
Someone at the Mail suggested the parents of the Muzzie thugs would be ashamed of them. No, they would be proud because Muzzie men are supposed to beat women who get out of line. She was lucky she wasn’t raped, and then murdered for her crime of having sex.
Actually in Europe Asian means Missile east. In England boot means trunk in a car. Gotta know the source.
Can’t even guess it by contrnt, for in America racial attacks on women are black sourced while in Europe it’s Muslims.
In all cases it’s not Amish though...
All Liberal Policy, followed to it’s ultimate end, results in the rape and murder of white women.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.