Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Ryan Argues to Hannity that Tax Credits in GOP Healthcare Bill Aren't Entitlements
PJ Media ^ | 03/10 | Bridget Johnson

Posted on 03/10/2017 10:43:48 AM PST by SeekAndFind

WASHINGTON -- House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) was chief lobbyist for the Republican Obamacare replacement bill Thursday, but conservatives and moderates in the Senate were indicating that their votes may not be there.

Ryan spent his weekly press conference giving a lengthy professorial lecture on the basics and benefits of the American Health Care Act, assisted by visual aids.

"We are going to repeal and replace Obamacare and we're going to do it with a three-pronged approach. Number one is what we're talking about right now... that's called reconciliation. That's the American Health Care Act. There are only so many things you can do in that bill because of the Senate floor rules for reconciliation. You can't put everything you want in that legislation because if you did, it would be filibustered and you couldn't even bring it up for a vote in the Senate," he explained.

"Number two, administrative action. This law, Obamacare, has 1,442 sections or instances that gives the secretary of HHS enormous amounts of discretion to administer healthcare, meaning I don't think Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid when they crammed this bill through ever thought Donald Trump would be president and Tom Price would be the secretary of HHS," he continued. "So, number two in our three-pronged approach, administrative action where the Health and Human Services secretary deregulates the marketplace and allows more choice and more competition to come in the marketplace."

"Number three, and this is where I think there's a lot of confusion all over the map -- additional legislation that we feel is important and necessary to give us a truly competitive healthcare marketplace. So, think of things like interstate shopping. That's a reform that we've long believed in, that we think is really important to get regulatory competition to give people even more choices."

Ryan also took his case to conservative talk radio, booking Hugh Hewitt's show Friday and calling into Sean Hannity's radio show this afternoon.

"The last thing we want to do is repeal it, and then have replace being filibustered. We want to repeal it, and put the replace in the repeal bill so that they can’t filibuster it so we can get House Republican conservative health care policy in place," Ryan told Hannity.

The speaker also argued that the tax credits in the GOP plan aren't an entitlement.

“No, that’s not an entitlement. Letting people keep more of their own money and doing what they want with it is not an entitlement," Ryan said. "...If you think letting people keep more of their own money and letting them do what they want with it is an entitlement, then you must believe this is Washington’s money."

"...So I don’t, for the life of me, understand why a person would say giving taxpayers tax credits is an entitlement.”

The GOP leadership offensive continues Friday morning with as House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Greg Walden (R-Ore.), Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas), and Budget Committee Chairman Diane Black (R-Tenn.) face media on Capitol Hill to argue for the bill.

But Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said House Republicans need to pump the brakes and start over.

"There's no urgency here. There is no deadline. We need to get health care reform right. We don't have to get it fast," Cotton told CNN. "...Unfortunately, the House legislation is not going to achieve those results and the breakneck speed at which it's moving is designed to actually make those results probably worse. That's why I think we just need to take a pause and to deliberate more carefully and more openly, and get to a result that's actually going to make healthcare more affordable and more hassle-free for Americans."

The senator added that "there are a lot of Republicans who are saying these exact same things in private."

"Frankly, some of them on Steve Scalise's whip team are saying the same thing. I'm simply saying in public what many Republicans are voicing that the legislation as it's written, one, probably cannot pass the Senate, but two, would not solve the problems of our health care system -- problems that Obamacare made worse," Cotton said. "I think the American people care much more that we solve those problems than that we meet some kind of arbitrary legislative deadline."

Congressional GOP leaders have vowed to take up the healthcare repeal and replacement bill before the Easter recess.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporter Wednesday that "while we can forget the timeline, ultimately it's going to be up to the House and then the Senate to determine how fast it goes."

"But there are members on each of those committees, and then ultimately every member on the floor that has the ability to give input," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hannity; healthcare; obamacare20; obamatrumpcare; paulryan; rinocare; rynocare; speakerryaninterview; speaskerryan; taxcredits; trumpcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Mr. Douglas
Mr.Douglas: "The R’s have simply confirmed that I was right to leave their branch of the #uniparty back when Dubya was prez. They are doing what they do."

Yeah, but now they're called RYNOs.

21 posted on 03/10/2017 11:22:13 AM PST by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
RE:”The speaker also argued that the tax credits in the GOP plan aren't an entitlement.
“No, that’s not an entitlement. Letting people keep more of their own money and doing what they want with it is not an entitlement,” Ryan said. “...If you think letting people keep more of their own money and letting them do what they want with it is an entitlement, then you must believe this is Washington’s money.”

Letting people keep more of their own money is called a tax cut or tax deduction not a tax credit.

Earned income tax credits are not ‘letting people keep their own money’, they are giving them other peoples money.

22 posted on 03/10/2017 11:26:04 AM PST by sickoflibs (All hell broke loose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There should be no federal health care “plan.” Just federal guarantees of freedom.


23 posted on 03/10/2017 11:29:31 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/IYUYya6bPGw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sometimes, having a few dissenting Republicans can be a good thing....


24 posted on 03/10/2017 11:38:39 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

No, but fair is fair.

A few Grand tax credit to someone who has to buy their own health ins is no different than not taxing your employer paid BCBS.


25 posted on 03/10/2017 11:45:23 AM PST by Beagle8U (Long live Yoga Pants! ( and boycott 84 lumber. Let's bankrupt the bastards!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

I simply took action and moved from the City to a 12 acre farm (now 32 acres) in south central Rural KY. I’m just kind of watching the show from afar since I bought the place two weeks before the 2008 election.

Trumps great in a lot of ways, but our problems are past a human solution. I’ve been saying that for years, just watching things get worse, exponentially. I put my faith in Christ and the worldwide events over the last century prove that is they only source of hope.


26 posted on 03/10/2017 11:54:51 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker
Single Payer does not work, not for the middle class, not for the poor, not for the working class. It only works for the politicians and the very wealthy who can make their own market deals or for whom the government keeps a separate system, like for congressmen and high level bureaucrats. It depresses the economy and contributes to poorer health overall as the medical talent goes into other fields. In a market system the best and the brightest go into either the hard sciences or into Medicine. In a government system the mediocre and the rent seekers go into Medicine. Sure, everybody gets to see a doctor but it won't be a doctor like we have been used to, it will be a much lesser trained medic because educational standards have to be lowered. It will also be a clinic setting with several days necessary to get in for an emergency. In the English model and now in Canada the rulers of the system artificially stretch out wait times for necessary surgery so that a large portion of the aspiring patients will die. Treatment is refused to people past a certain age, especially if they are drawing government pensions and not working. I suppose that is a system that works for the government, anyway. It ties up people, reduces the middle class, decreases mobility, and vastly increases popular dependence on government.
27 posted on 03/10/2017 12:18:00 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

this ba$tard is too secure in his seat...

PRIMARY FOR EVERY RINO THAT SUPPORTS THIS POS

SEND TRUMP A MESSAGE TOO if we need to


28 posted on 03/10/2017 12:37:46 PM PST by Mr. K (Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Wow! Some people will have money to burn. With the income tax refund from EIC that they never paid and then a huge tax credit for insurance. The welfare crowd will be rolling in the dough.


29 posted on 03/10/2017 12:40:33 PM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Paul Ryan is quite an adept liar, so this is not surprising from him.


30 posted on 03/10/2017 12:42:06 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

EITC. Earned income tax credit. They get back money they never paid in. This is the same thing.
Another federal welfare program.


31 posted on 03/10/2017 12:42:41 PM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Valid point.

But better to abolish the income tax and sever the connection between the employer and insurance.


32 posted on 03/10/2017 12:44:10 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/IYUYya6bPGw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I didn’t say it works *WELL*, merely that those two are the only systems that are not a will-nilly hodgepodge of the worst of socialized medicine and Darwinian free markets.


33 posted on 03/10/2017 12:54:15 PM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, deport all illegal aliens, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have no problem with doing this repeal in 2-3 stages. My problem is with the actual substance of the legislation. What happened to doing away with the individual mandate?


34 posted on 03/10/2017 1:04:01 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

” Lyin’ Ryan.”

Phew! Finally glad it is not Cruz!


35 posted on 03/10/2017 8:48:03 PM PST by longhorn too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

>Not entitlements any more than SS an Medicare- you paid for them. To those who pay nothing they ARE entitlements.

Yes, that *ARE* entitlements. They *are* TAXES. You cannot bequeath, take on your own schedule or cash out...they are NOT “yours”.

When they tout 30-payers per retiree...that’s a Ponzi scheme as well.

A federal taxpayer provided check for $$ one never earned, THAT’S an entitlement. Keeping your OWN $$, is not


36 posted on 03/11/2017 5:16:28 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

“The last thing we want to do is repeal it, and then have replace being filibustered...”

Heaven forbid we’d want THAT to happen. Govt completely out of an area where it has no power nor authority!?

How WILL the People survive? /s

Slimy snake-oil salesman. NEVER following his own promises and rules (going to rush it through in the dead of night).


37 posted on 03/11/2017 5:18:19 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg; JimRed

>
The purpose of that deduction is to encourage ownership, which (generally) builds wealth over the long term and helps maintain a more stable society than tenancies do.

And the purpose behind my employer-provided healthcare is to encourage people to work here. And it’s pretty effective.
>

Touche.

REF: “the purpose”. Sorry, but DEMs, and govt in general, loved to use that phrase. It’s not the OUTCOME it’s the INTENTION that matters.

IE: “It’s purpose is to solve crime. We are passing a law the 2nd A. is null and void”.

Damn our Rights, damn the authority to begin....and we get what we have today.


38 posted on 03/11/2017 5:24:18 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson