Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump to Undo Vehicle Rules That Curb Global Warming
New York Times ^ | March 3, 2017 | CORAL DAVENPORT

Posted on 03/04/2017 4:22:33 AM PST by reaganaut1

The Trump administration is expected to begin rolling back stringent federal regulations on vehicle pollution that contributes to global warming, according to people familiar with the matter, essentially marking a U-turn to efforts to force the American auto industry to produce more electric cars.

The announcement — which is expected as soon as Tuesday and will be made jointly by the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, Scott Pruitt, and the transportation secretary, Elaine L. Chao — will immediately start to undo one of former President Barack Obama’s most significant environmental legacies.

During the same week, and possibly on the same day, Mr. Trump is expected to direct Mr. Pruitt to begin the more lengthy and legally complex process of dismantling the Clean Power Plan, Mr. Obama’s rules to cut planet-warming pollution from coal-fired power plants.

The regulatory rollback on vehicle pollution will relax restrictions on tailpipe emissions of carbon dioxide and will not require action by Congress. It will also have a major effect on the United States auto industry.

Under the Obama administration’s vehicle fuel economy standards, American automakers were locked into nearly a decade of trying to design and build ever more sophisticated fuel-efficient vehicles, including electric and hybrid models. The nation’s largest auto companies told Mr. Trump last month that they found those technical requirements too burdensome.

The E.P.A. will also begin legal proceedings to revoke a waiver for California that was allowing the state to enforce the tougher tailpipe standards for its drivers.

On Feb. 21, a coalition of the 17 largest companies that sell cars in the United States sent two letters to Mr. Pruitt, asking him to revisit the tailpipe rules. They said it may be “the single most important decision the E.P.A. has made in recent history.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: automotive; cars; fakenews; fakescience; nyts; regulations; trumpclimatechange; trumpregulations; vehicles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: ChildOfThe60s

Missouri gas stations can offer straight premium gasoline, 91 or 93 octane. It’s all I use in my mowers, outboard motors and the like.
Unfortunately, it $.50 to $.65 over 87 oxy.


21 posted on 03/04/2017 5:39:38 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“Many vehicles are now designed for E85.”

Check the BTU per gallon difference between E85 and gasoline.

L


22 posted on 03/04/2017 5:40:25 AM PST by Lurker (America burned the witch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Thanks for posting that site. Looked up my state and found a station in my town that I did not know about.


23 posted on 03/04/2017 5:40:58 AM PST by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Be nice to get some horsepower back. Get rid of the useless TPMS as well.


24 posted on 03/04/2017 5:42:39 AM PST by maddog55 (America Rising)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Let the farmers and libtards burn E85.


25 posted on 03/04/2017 5:48:00 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
This is precisely the type of governance I was hoping to see from President Trump.

Now scrap that CAFE garbage while you're at it.

26 posted on 03/04/2017 5:49:22 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

If these vehicle rules curbed global warming, why is there still global warming (according to the DemocRATS)?


27 posted on 03/04/2017 5:58:12 AM PST by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The EPA has been a pawn of the progressive ecco-nazis for a long time. But it has grown particularly bad in the last decade. Regulations that conflict with each other - ever-lower emissions requirements along with every increasing MPG requirements. There is a reason VW got "caught" doctoring their figures on emissions - and apparently some others (Chrysler/RAM). Several years ago - a friend of mine (now a Deacon at one of my former churches) bought a brand new RAM 2500 Cummins for his farm. Nice truck. It was getting a calculated 22+mpg on the highway (no load). He was absolutely thrilled. Then comes this recall notice - apparently there was a computer tuning that needed to be updated due to emissions being greater than allowed under the law. He took it in, the dealer did the mandatory reprogram. He never again saw over 19mpg. So he lost over 10% in fuel efficiency - all to reduce emissions by less than 2%. Now - I'm no with wiz, but it sounds to me like he is burning more fuel, which actually results in a net MORE emissions than before the re-tune. Kind of like folks who burn E85 in their car - you reduce emissions, but you also burn ⅓ more fuel. Per gallon of fuel burned, you produce fewer "greenhouse gasses", but because you are burning significantly more fuel (which required the burning of fuel to produce in the fields as corn, to haul to ethanol production plants, etc.) - you are actually spending more $ and creating MORE emissions in total. It is all a scam.
28 posted on 03/04/2017 6:01:50 AM PST by TheBattman (Gun control works - just ask Chicago...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon

His support has nothing to do with the environment - it is about supporting subsidies and payouts for producing ethanol. It’s called vote buying.


29 posted on 03/04/2017 6:03:15 AM PST by TheBattman (Gun control works - just ask Chicago...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Around here, a very small number of stations offer “no ethanol” gasoline. It is usually 10-20 cents per gallon more.


30 posted on 03/04/2017 6:04:22 AM PST by TheBattman (Gun control works - just ask Chicago...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

When truly allowed to exist, real “free markets” take away power from politicians. They can’t have that!

As to choice - I agree. Remove the subsidies and price supports, as well as the mandates for Ethanol. Then let the market decide. If people want to burn ethanol - if it makes them feel all warm and fuzzy... then great! It is like those electric and hybrid vehicles - do NOT subsidize the manufacture and sale of them, take away the tax credits for buying them - and let them compete on an even platform. Let consumers decide.

And If I want to buy a big truck with big horsepower that burns a bunch of gas (or diesel) - I should be able to, right off a dealer’s lot - and no manufacturer should be penalized because their “fleet efficiency” isn’t a certain level.


31 posted on 03/04/2017 6:08:44 AM PST by TheBattman (Gun control works - just ask Chicago...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The E.P.A. will also begin legal proceedings to revoke a waiver for California that was allowing the state to enforce the tougher tailpipe standards for its drivers.

This right here is the part that will DEVESTATE the Watermelon crowd. EVERY COMPANY on the Planet Builds their products to the MUCH HIGHER Standards of California. This REMOVES THE INFLUENCE CALIFORNIA has on the Rest of the Country. CARB in California only has the AUTHORITY TO OPERATE because of this Waiver. Once repealed they are OUT OF BUSINESS!!!


32 posted on 03/04/2017 6:15:27 AM PST by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Yo, “Shadow Government”... bend over.


33 posted on 03/04/2017 6:24:51 AM PST by Charles Martel (Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

The ethanol damages the fuel systems of older cars as well.


34 posted on 03/04/2017 6:29:31 AM PST by wjcsux (The hyperventilating of the left means we are winning! (Tagline courtesy of Laz.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"The Trump administration is expected to begin rolling back stringent federal regulations on vehicle pollution that supposedly contributes to global warming, according to people familiar with the matter.."

Corrected.

35 posted on 03/04/2017 6:33:24 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Hillary Clinton IS a felon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Agreed.


36 posted on 03/04/2017 6:34:12 AM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

very neutral headline. /s


37 posted on 03/04/2017 6:36:16 AM PST by mykroar (Congratulations President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Maybe they’ll stop fostering us, with all of those vehicles whith 18” = 21” wheels, on vehicles that sit so high up, running boards are needed to get in or out of them easily.


38 posted on 03/04/2017 6:39:28 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

The global warming hoax AKA “Climate Guiltism”, is about to be dealt a stunning blow.


39 posted on 03/04/2017 6:59:21 AM PST by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

OK!! Everybody pay attention!

Lesson for today:

1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.

2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.

3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.

4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.

5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.

Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?


40 posted on 03/04/2017 7:15:01 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson