Posted on 02/22/2017 6:47:08 AM PST by PROCON
If I tried to donate my AR to the Army, it would not be allowed as it does not operate like theirs do.
The Military uses “assault” weapons. Citizens do not.
This example is proof of that. The court is either ignorant or undermining the Constitution.
Guess which I think it is?
That, too.....................
So is the human mind for that matter.
Is the text of the decision and dissent online? I saw no reference to the actual case name.
The text of the published decision is available from the Court here:
http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/141945A.P.pdf
Not this sh* again!
This had better get overturned somewhere.
Or even 12 gauge shotguns will be considered military weapons of war:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_combat_shotguns
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_individual_weapons_of_the_U.S._Armed_Forces#Shotguns
M870 (pump-action 12 gauge) (USCG)
M1014 (semi-automatic 12 gauge) (US Army and USMC)
M26 (Modular Accessory Shotgun System) (bolt-action 12 gauge attachment) (US Army)
Ithaca Model 37 (pump-action 12 gauge)
Pancor Jackhammer (gas-operated 12 gauge)
Remington 7188 (full-auto 12 gauge) (Navy SEALs)
Remington Model 10 (pump-action 12 gauge)
Remington Model 11 (semi-automatic 12 gauge)
Remington Model 31 (pump-action 12 gauge)
Springfield Model 1881 Forager (20 gauge)
Stevens Model 520-30 (pump-action 12 gauge)
Stevens Model 620 (pump-action 12 gauge)
Winchester 1200 (pump-action 12 gauge)
Winchester Model 1912 (pump-action 12 gauge)
Winchester Model 1897 (pump-action 12 gauge)
CAWS entrants, specifically HK CAWS
https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2016/4/22/combat-shotguns-of-the-vietnam-war/
http://www.benning.army.mil/infantry/magazine/issues/2013/Jul-Sep/Phillips.html
Introduced to military service during World War I as a tool for clearing trenches, shotguns have been in the Army’s arms rooms for almost 100 years.
Thanks!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fourth_Circuit
A Clinton appointee. Along with a bunch of OTHER Clinton, Carter and Obama appointees,
OMG, Almost 90 pages of emotion-driven leftist claptrap. It’s going to take a while to digest this garbage.
Well, this is good:
But personal “weapons of war” are exactly what the Second Amendment protects.
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
That implies that with a ten to four ruling, even two of the libs agreed with us.
What is a “high-powered” magazine? I though magazines simply stored the bullets that you needed for your gun. There’s no “high power” about them!
“What is a “high-powered” magazine? I though magazines simply stored the bullets that you needed for your gun. There’s no “high power” about them!”
Several months ago, we had some fun commenting about the ignorance of the Fraud and a fawning reporter regarding “high powered magazines”:
JACKSON, MS (Mississippi News Now) -
President Barack Obama is pledging to reinstate an assault weapons ban by January. He proposes removing all military style assault weapons and high powered magazines. If this ban goes into affect, what would it do to sales on the black market?
Source: http://www.msnewsnow.com/story/20394914/what-would-a-partial-gun-ban-mean-to-you
Mine has a similar rule. I define my pocketknife as a tool which I use often in the course of my job. They gave up.
Totally, completely agree.
Time to impeach black robed tyrants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.