Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US appeals court upholds Maryland assault weapons ban
AP ^ | Feb. 22, 2017 | AP

Posted on 02/22/2017 6:47:08 AM PST by PROCON

ANNAPOLIS, Md. – Maryland's ban on 45 kinds of assault weapons and its 10-round limit on gun magazines were upheld Tuesday by a federal appeals court in a decision that met with a strongly worded dissent.

In a 10-4 ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., said the guns banned under Maryland's law aren't protected by the Second Amendment.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: ar15; assaultrifle; baltimore; banglist; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: rktman

21 posted on 02/22/2017 7:02:00 AM PST by PROCON (Defending the Border isn't a Political Option, it's a Constitutional Obligation ~ Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Should be appealed to the Supreme Court where I would hope for a more favorable result by the time the case is heard. John Browning’s Hi Power, with a magazine capacity of 13, went into production in 1935 and has been widely used in Europe since then. This model was imported into the U.S. and has been around for decades. Why is capacity greater than 10 suddenly illegal? To me this is simply a first step in outright gun control and an attack on personal freedoms.


22 posted on 02/22/2017 7:02:25 AM PST by Boomer One ( ToUsesn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Weapons of war?

My goodness, my pitchfork was considered a weapon of war in the middle ages in Europe. Sometimes the Peasant levies only had farm implements to use when called up by their lords and masters.


23 posted on 02/22/2017 7:03:09 AM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

All citizens have the exact right to posses and use any weapon currently used by law enforcement, including machine guns.

Neither side should have an advantage in weaponry power.

If a SWAT team comes barging into a private residence, the home owner shall have the same fire power to repel the invading force. It is as simple as that.

There may come a time when the private citizen will be needed to defend the homeland against a foreign or domestic entity. This is the MAIN reason we have the 2nd amendment enshrined in our constitution.


24 posted on 02/22/2017 7:03:39 AM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dacula

What kind of weapons do they think the well regulated militia is supposed to use? Spit balls???


25 posted on 02/22/2017 7:05:40 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

The most ironic part of that statement is that the Second Amendment was intended precisely to protect ownership of the weapons of war required by an infantryman.


26 posted on 02/22/2017 7:08:02 AM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Judicial willful ignorance............

What if it's deliberate ignorance? Meaning, if they deliberately rule this way the only alternatives plaintiffs have is to spend more money and resources appealing. Get it?

Liberals have all but abandoned an immutable moral code and by extension, the rule of law. I am convinced that they believe themselves above all else and can do whatever to achieve their preferred outcome.

27 posted on 02/22/2017 7:09:17 AM PST by Obadiah (Democrats continue their crusade against normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Judicial willful rewriting of the Constitution.


28 posted on 02/22/2017 7:11:55 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

***”...we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war,”***

Say what! Those who can remember back in the 1920s Dark Ages, when Springfield and Rock Island were making the 1903 bolt action rifle they also made some of the best hunting and target rifles for the public. They were told to stop as it was competing with commercial manufacturers.


29 posted on 02/22/2017 7:14:06 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (GAY MARRIAGE- Like declaring a dog's tail to be a leg giving a dog 5 legs. But it is still a tail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus

Silly. We all know it was about deer hunting. LOL!


30 posted on 02/22/2017 7:15:15 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
...they believe themselves above all else and can do whatever to achieve their preferred outcome.

They do. They have always been that way.

31 posted on 02/22/2017 7:18:45 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Bows and arrows, spears, lances, maces, clubs, tomahawks, rocks, sticks.......................


32 posted on 02/22/2017 7:20:28 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Are hot tar and feathers considered "weapons of war"?

If not, I can see a few places where they should be generously applied...

33 posted on 02/22/2017 7:22:28 AM PST by Gritty (Appeasing Islamic terrorists doesn't work, never worked, and will never work.- Daniel Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Isn’t an axe or hatchet also a “weapon of war”? It looks like SCOTUS is going to have to set these JV buffoons straight.


34 posted on 02/22/2017 7:24:38 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Okay, so, how do we get impeachment proceedings started?

Does it require deep pockets? A senator with courage?


35 posted on 02/22/2017 7:26:01 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Isn’t an axe or hatchet also a “weapon of war”? It looks like SCOTUS is going to have to set these JV buffoons straight.


36 posted on 02/22/2017 7:27:34 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yep. All the above and more.


37 posted on 02/22/2017 7:27:48 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Arms, legs, fists, hands, fingers, teeth..................


38 posted on 02/22/2017 7:28:51 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911
the 2A IS for weapons of war as it isn't for hunting, rather, fending off tyranny by govt

the AR15 is cousin to the M16 - get it kids? - these a-holes intentionally got it wrong

Yes, it's quite intentional. Back when the U.S. vs. Miller decision was rendered, the Supreme Court used "militia weapons" as a legal standard, to determine whether 2A protection extended to other firearms as well. Federal judges have carefully avoided speaking of that in the decades since.

39 posted on 02/22/2017 7:34:39 AM PST by Charles Martel (Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

It suspiciously ignores the M9, a weapon of war which used to be built by Beretta in Maryland. The civilian version is readily available in Maryland gun shops.


40 posted on 02/22/2017 7:45:39 AM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson