Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GonzoII

IMO, NATO allowed itself to go so far beyond its original charter it seems almost incapable of rehabilitation. Their forays of support for direct violent action in support of the Muslim Obama on continental Africa (Libya) was inexcusable in my opinion.

Personally, I think it is a bloated and ill-used organization that has become steeped in this European Union like mentality that it clearly doesn’t support US interests.

This is its last chance to come to Jesus or be relegated to the same ilk of the League of Nations.


3 posted on 02/21/2017 8:11:47 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

NATO has degenerated into mere muscle for globalism. It has become what it was intended to prevent.


5 posted on 02/21/2017 9:26:52 AM PST by Psalm 144 (Ace McCain, the Songbird. See "loose cannon".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer

It has been without a mission since 1991. It needs to change or die. Do we need NATO? Is it in the US’s interest to continue this alliance? I think yes but the terms must be changed and updated to a post-Soviet world.


8 posted on 02/21/2017 11:31:29 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer

Libya was pushed by France and it was Obama who chose to support them. It wasn’t an operation mandated by the NATO treaty.


9 posted on 02/24/2017 2:51:51 AM PST by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson