Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A ‘Shadow Cabinet’ to Restrain Trump - Sharp critiques of extreme policies from eminent ex-offls
WSJ ^ | 2/15/2017 | DAVID ROBERTS

Posted on 02/18/2017 10:39:59 AM PST by dirtboy

We need to make America great again, and for that Donald Trump might be our man. For all the anxiety the White House has caused, brewing constitutional crises at home and anger abroad, Mr. Trump has opened a path to reunify this politically divided nation.

A “team of rivals” that transcends party lines, composed of eminent men and women, could rein in the administration. This bipartisan group, preferably endorsed by past U.S. presidents, would be made up of former cabinet members and heads of independent federal agencies. Inspired by the British Shadow Cabinet, it would be structured to mirror the official cabinet and would issue rapid, sharp critiques and cogent alternatives to the administration’s most dangerous policies.

By becoming a recognizable public fixture, the group would wield the clout necessary to compete with the White House’s megaphone, offering the disgruntled public a clear opposing stance rather than the disparate, and sometimes desperate, efforts today. The group would provide the opposition much-needed focus by identifying the most destructive policies and pronouncements: some examples from the first few weeks include antagonizing our allies, forcing through an ill-considered immigrant ban, undermining the judicial system, and politicizing the National Security Council.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: davidcroberts; davidroberts; deepstate; fakenews; obama; shadowcabinet; shadowgovernment; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Sasparilla

And, somehow, no one sees to fit to stop this kind of monstrous interference, directly orchestrated by Obama, at Republicans’ town halls.

http://nypost.com/2017/02/18/obama-linked-activists-have-a-training-manual-for-protesting-trump/

Hello, Republicans, get ID’s at the door of everyone at these town halls, to verify they actually live in your district!!! #GETACLUE


21 posted on 02/18/2017 10:58:11 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

The neo-communists (previously known as neo-cons, globalists, and the RINO/DNC alliance) are pissed that President Trump is bringing their progressive gravy train to a screeching halt.

One thing that the globalist free trader crowd here at FR has to remember:

All of those investments you made in communist countries DO NOT BELONG TO YOU! They belong to the communists that you are dealing with. You have absolutely no recourse to recover losses WHEN they take your business over through expropriation.


22 posted on 02/18/2017 11:01:25 AM PST by factoryrat (We reserve the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Stop Trump? No- stop the will of the American people whose will Trump is carrying out! The minority has been ruling the majority and is determined to continue to do so. They would destroy the Constitution and the country itself to accomplish their goals. We- and Trump- must be more determined that they will not do so. Unity is impossible when your opponent defines unity as ‘obedience’.


23 posted on 02/18/2017 11:01:44 AM PST by ClearBlueSky (ISLAM is the problem. ISLAM is the enemy of civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Well stated. Still, there’s nothing to prevent someone forming a ‘shadow’ government. If the DNC wanted to vet some of their members or anyone else as being ready to step in as cabinet secretaries, assuming they could be vetted by the Senate, no one would gainsay them their kabuki. One problem I see is that the Democratic bench is so thin, if not empty, they wouldn’t have enough players to form a scrum.

As long as no taxpayer money is involved, what do we care?


24 posted on 02/18/2017 11:03:50 AM PST by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

25 posted on 02/18/2017 11:07:46 AM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Couple hours ago there was a crawler on FNC that NSC head resigns, haven’t heard a peep about it since.


26 posted on 02/18/2017 11:08:16 AM PST by txhurl (The LEFT are screaming at the Tsunami, and the Sky, trying to set fire to the Ocean- S.Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

There already is a group who should constantly critique Trump’s actions: the people who voted for him.

Anyone advocating for another group to change his actions is really saying they want our votes to be negated and they want us to get Hillary even though Trump won. This is the opposite of “democracy” which the left claims to value.


27 posted on 02/18/2017 11:11:10 AM PST by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Trump doesn’t need people to slow him or direct him or whatever....he didn’t get here by being like the rest ...HE GOT HERE BY BEING BETTER AND DIFFERENT AND MEANER THAN THE REST.

DAMN the torpedoes, FULL SPEED AHEAD.


28 posted on 02/18/2017 11:11:25 AM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Which Democrat bigwig is going to admit he’s not really in much of a leadership position and volunteer to be the go-to Veterans Affairs guy? Only someone relatively young or inexperienced, who will command no respect from ambitious Democrat bigwigs.

I have suggested that the GOP should require presidential primary candidates to pledge to serve in the Cabinet of the winner, and the winner pledge to appoint his rivals. That would be something similar to the parliamentary system. And it would NEVER happen here.


29 posted on 02/18/2017 11:15:00 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
Such an arrangement under our Constitution is foolish and unnecessary, since the interests of the branches and their separate powers, and -- at least in Madison's mind -- far more importantly, the States themselves, are intended to check the natural tendency to overreach by ambitious men.

Since the "shadow cabinet" members work for no one but themselves, have no authority, and no responsibility, they would be nothing more than a semi-officially recognized babble of talking heads; they would contend with each other as often as the government, and they would contribute nothing when unified that the opposition doesn't already provide.

We already have that.

30 posted on 02/18/2017 11:16:20 AM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

The neo-communists (previously known as neo-cons, globalists, and the RINO/DNC alliance) are pissed that President Trump is bringing their progressive gravy train to a screeching halt.

One thing that the globalist free trader crowd here at FR has to remember:


Careful there, cowboy.

Neo-communists were a faction of the Soviet government.

If you’re saying that neo-cons are communists, even given the protean definition of ‘neo-con,’ I think you’re beclowning yourself. But then, maybe I’m just part of some ‘crowd’ here at FR.


31 posted on 02/18/2017 11:16:22 AM PST by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Maybe by Memorial day they’ll finally figure out that they lost. That’s six months.
A lot of these guys are upper class twits you know. My parrot loves the WSJ.


32 posted on 02/18/2017 11:18:58 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Who said they are “eminent,” they themselves?


33 posted on 02/18/2017 11:20:08 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

WE WON, YOU LOST. No “Participation trophies” for you.


34 posted on 02/18/2017 11:22:00 AM PST by goodnesswins (Say hello to President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Bugger off, punks!


35 posted on 02/18/2017 11:26:48 AM PST by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

No clowning around ....
Irving Kristol (Bill’s pappy) the “godfather of neoconservatives” was a Trotskyite.
Kristol was born in Brooklyn, New York, the son of non-observant Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe, Bessie (Mailman) and Joseph Kristol.
He received his B.A. from the City College of New York in 1940, where he majored in history and was part of a small but vocal Trotskyist anti-Soviet group who eventually became the New York Intellectuals.

They were anti-Soviet because Trotsky urged an international war by communists against capitalist, bourgeois countries while Stalin wanted to consolidate a rather shaky hold on a very large landmass.

They don’t like to be called liberals or socialists, preferring to be called progressives; in fact, Kristol & Co. actually have the temerity to call themselves conservatives.
But we know why “neocons” constantly urge war all over the globe and applaud people like Obama and Clinton, while ignoring our own borders and the Weal of the American people. And we know what they really are: Reds, neo-communists.


36 posted on 02/18/2017 11:31:58 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Because they know better.


37 posted on 02/18/2017 11:33:56 AM PST by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Shove it, neo-com. You’re secretly pissed that Lincoln freed the slaves, that Teddy Roosevelt busted the robber barons, that Eisenhower deported your wetback laborers, and that President Trump is threatening to cut off your communist chinese financed sweatshops.

The only difference between the likes of you and communist regimes is the red flags and snappy uniforms.


38 posted on 02/18/2017 11:36:23 AM PST by factoryrat (We reserve the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

The “Shadow Government” is already known by another name - the “Deep State”.

Funny, but for a “government in exile”, shouldn’t the people who populate those positions actually BE in exile?

Perhaps we should oblige.

Iran had a “Shadow Government” before the Shah was kicked out by Jimmy Carter. By bringing the Ayatollah Khomeini back from Paris, a whole chain of events was put into action that has had most grievous results.

Not Jimmy’s best moment.


39 posted on 02/18/2017 11:39:05 AM PST by alloysteel (John Galt has chosen to take the job. This time, Atlas did NOT shrug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

Wow. You are one bombastic clown.


40 posted on 02/18/2017 11:40:24 AM PST by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson