Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The White House has found ways to end protection for 'Dreamers' while shielding Trump from blowback
Los Angeles Times ^ | 17 Feb 17 | Brian Bennet and Michael Memoli

Posted on 02/17/2017 2:21:53 PM PST by SkyPilot

hile President Trump wavered Thursday on whether he will stop shielding from deportation people who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children, his aides have identified at least two ways to quietly end their protections without his fingerprints.

An executive order has already been drafted to end the program, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, that allows hundreds of thousands of the immigrants to live and work openly in the U.S. Trump used that legal mechanism to great fanfare to expand deportation authority and restrict entry to the U.S.

But with the president showing less willingness to sign such an order, advisors have begun to explore alternatives. Their hunt suggests that the White House is hesitant to publicly target a well-organized group of immigrants who have prominent public backing, including from President Obama, and to whom Trump has shown sympathy.

Trump weighs mobilizing 100,000 National Guard troops for immigration roundups »

“DACA is a very, very difficult subject for me,” Trump conceded during a rambling East Room news conference Thursday, promising to address the issue “with heart.… It’s one of the most difficult subjects I have because you have these incredible kids.”

Trump is caught between two camps. His supporters count the end of deportation protections as a key component of his promise to strengthen immigration enforcement. In campaign speeches, Trump repeatedly promised to end the program on “day one” of his presidency and called the protections “unconstitutional executive amnesty.”

On the other side, a mix of stakeholders, including the 750,000 people who have won work permits, want to see even more immigrants allowed to come out of the shadows. And some Republican strategists are concerned that suspending DACA could energize Latino voters and liberal activists in key congressional districts during the midterm elections next year.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: daca; dreamers; first100days; illegals; immigration; trump; trump45; trumpdaca
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Lurkinanloomin

Granted. I think for such individuals a different path could be forged. But I just haven’t come upon a plan that sounds right yet. Has Congress addressed this?


41 posted on 02/17/2017 3:01:05 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Wisdom of Solomon. Deport the parents. If the children don’t want separation, then they go with parents. If children are still minors, they go with parents.


42 posted on 02/17/2017 3:01:16 PM PST by petitfour (Americans need to repent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

If only the letters would really say that! Instead of just saying “Sorry, you’re rejected,” say, “your spot was given to a Dreamer.” I think we would soon see a change then as outraged kids and parents DEMAND change.


43 posted on 02/17/2017 3:02:56 PM PST by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sheana
I live in an area where those ‘incredible kids’ are outnumbering the white kids. A huge majority of them grow up to be thugs.

I'm shocked. Shocked! I tell you.

Head 'em up. Move 'em out. Rawhide!

44 posted on 02/17/2017 3:04:28 PM PST by NorthMountain (CNN is VERY Fake News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Not just 'bad hombres': Trump is targeting up to 8 million people for deportation

Just 8 million" What about the other 30 mil or so? No, he can't be deporting that many but...he can sure as hell let them know that them all are "targeted."

45 posted on 02/17/2017 3:11:12 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

They do:

They have examined at least two options that would not directly involve Trump, according to two immigration policy advisors to the White House:

a lawsuit brought by states,

Another possible path involves the courts. A handful of governors are considering a challenge patterned on the 2014 lawsuit filed by several conservative state officials against the Obama administration’s expansion of deportation protections. If they sue, Sessions could instruct his lawyers not to defend the program in court, exposing it to indefinite suspension by a federal judge.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

and new legal guidance that details who is a priority for deportation.

Under that option, Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions, a vocal critic of deportation relief as a senator, would direct Department of Justice lawyers to review the program, which issues two-year work permits to people who qualify and keeps them from being categorized as deportation priorities.

If the Justice Department determines that DACA is not legal or is no longer a responsible use of prosecutorial discretion, the Department of Homeland Security would be instructed to stop awarding and renewing work permits.


46 posted on 02/17/2017 3:17:01 PM PST by Qiviut (Obama's Legacy in two words: DONALD TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Prosecuting a few moral edge cases loudly, but where the law is clear is a good way to telegraph what you should be doing if you’re an illegal alien. Getting prepared to self deport or be forced deported.

What’s forgotten is this is going to have a major impact on Mexico, particularly internal Mexican politics.


47 posted on 02/17/2017 3:20:01 PM PST by Fhios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I thought a judge struck down DACA as illegal given current immigration law passed by Congress.


48 posted on 02/17/2017 3:26:57 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Someone is going to wake them up ?


49 posted on 02/17/2017 3:27:02 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mongrel
"...thoroughly acculturated into the US."

What a steaming pile of BS!

"Stupid" statement of the day...acculturated

50 posted on 02/17/2017 3:34:05 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

“dreamer” is a very offensive term. It is a perversion of the phrase “American Dream” and an inversion of it.


51 posted on 02/17/2017 3:44:28 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

Stop issuing new ones and advise those who have current ones they will not be renewed. That gives them time to make arrangements to go home.


52 posted on 02/17/2017 4:09:20 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

No new paths to citizenship. We have one and they ignored it.


53 posted on 02/17/2017 4:10:25 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

The states sued to stop his second illegal action, DAPA.
Nobody sued to stop DACA because the GOP wanted him to do it.


54 posted on 02/17/2017 4:12:45 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Deport the illegals utilizing welfare services. Too many laying on our leg.


55 posted on 02/17/2017 5:12:45 PM PST by Joe Bfstplk (A Irredeemable Deplorable Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

>>Yes, but we also don’t put kids in prison for the sins of the parents. <<

And no one is sending them to prison now. Worst case for 99.99% of them they get a lifestyle stepdown.

Think of a middle class family whose dad gets busted for a white collar crime. Chances are they have to move to the other side of the tracks, mom has to go to work and doesn’t have time for the kids. Hamburger helper and Mac & Cheese replace sirloin and arugula. etc. etc. etc.

In this case, the kid goes back to start again. He/she can say “thanks mom and/or dad.”


56 posted on 02/17/2017 5:19:00 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Not tired of winning yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

This was a repeated Day One promise, one not kept. I do care the excuses, it is still a promise waiting to be fulfilled.


57 posted on 02/17/2017 5:59:20 PM PST by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp is not party specific. Lyn' Ted is still a liar, Good riddance to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

“In campaign speeches, Trump repeatedly promised to end the program on “day one” of his presidency and called the protections “unconstitutional executive amnesty.”

Correct. Trump on the campaign trail: “We’re going to keep the families together, but they have to go.”

“And some Republican strategists are concerned that suspending DACA could energize Latino voters and liberal activists in key congressional districts during the midterm elections next year.”

Fake news. The Latino voters were “energized” in November, and see where it got them. American voters were the most “energized”, being motivated by a candidate who would finally enforce the immigration laws, and swept Trump into office.

End DACA now, and reunite them with their families south of the border. It is the humane thing to do and will save the American taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.


58 posted on 02/17/2017 6:22:06 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Oh. That makes sense. Thanks.


59 posted on 02/17/2017 9:23:43 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
I guess it's settled now that the L.A. Times has published it.

Trump knows it will be a balancing act and is moving accordingly - hopefully his supporters aren't so tunnel-visioned that they start "having concerns" as he faithfully goes about doing his best to keep his promises.

60 posted on 02/18/2017 2:36:29 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson