yeah, sure. the simple fact that you think twitter needs to be “analyzed” proves that you are giving it infinitely more credit than it deserves — which is to be expected since your “analysis” is, as of the current date, a whole year old.
twitter is a vast intellectual wasteland. it is a massive pile of anonymous, unverified, unreliable, inconceivably ridiculous hysteria delivered by every moron that can afford broadband (or a wireless data plan) in 140 character snippets of depraved idiocy.
I know you think this is heresy. I understand that you think there is some sort of profound truth to be found in a billion people all talking trash at once. I think it’s at best annoying as hell, at quite possibly eroding what’s left of western culture 100 charcters at a time.
thanks for asking.
(and it doesn’t become an instant pillar of universal respectability simply because donald trump uses it to blast people that we all hate. it simply proves that something can’t be 100% contemptible; even the most useless thing in the universe has some use every now and then)
Not that it increases my knowledge - just that people understand your lack of it. 😀
You wrote, in your ignorance: " which is to be expected since your “analysis” is, as of the current date, a whole year old."
I wrote that I've been analyzing Twitter since October 2016. An ongoing endeavour, to be sure, but not "a whole year old", as you represented falsely.
Pretty sure that my continuing analysis is mere minutes old, after roughly 4 and a half months.
But I waste my time with you. Enjoy stewing in your solipsism, palsie. 😀