Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EarthResearcher333

I don’t know...something bothers me about the whole idea...
I have a problem with the concept of building something like that
and capturing that much emery and having no way of neutralizing it.
Like charging a capacitor with no way of grounding it,
or building a bomb with no way to defuse it.
I know they put two ‘bottom drains’ in the original design, but
they did not have the capacity to handle the river load,
and are currently non-functional.


2,597 posted on 03/22/2017 9:38:27 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2596 | View Replies ]


To: Repeal The 17th
Dams have been very instrumental in regulating flood conditions (via a reservoir buffer & controlled releases). The immense need for water for agriculture & the public created a necessity for managing (capturing) a precious resource.

Your analogy of the charged cap & live bomb is accurate. There cannot be any major flaws - especially in safety factor & redundancies. Losing a dam is not an option.

2,598 posted on 03/22/2017 10:01:18 PM PDT by EarthResearcher333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2597 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson