Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ninth Circuit Court Now Demands It Be Protected From Itself…
The Conservative Treehouse ^ | Feb. 10. 2017 | Sundance

Posted on 02/10/2017 5:22:10 PM PST by HarleyLady27

Oh, the winning… it’s often too funny. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is now independently, on its own impetus, requesting an internal vote on a full panel en blanc hearing to review its own decision.

Additionally, the full ninth are asking the Trump administration to file an additional brief telling the court why the three member original appeals ruling authority was wrong. In essence, the smart judges know what wasn’t considered, and are now looking for an out.

You just can’t make this stuff up.

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 9th; 9thcircuit; adgenda; constitution; courts; elections; first100days; mediabias; news; refugee; refugees; sundance; travelban; trump; trump45; trumpwinsagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-258 next last
To: Toespi

Talk about “Eyes in the back of your head” his eyes are so sunken his vision must be like looking through binoculars.


61 posted on 02/10/2017 5:48:37 PM PST by Boiler Plate ("Why be difficult, when with just a little more work, you can be impossible" Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I’m not buying it.

These “judges” aren’t doing this to reverse the decision but to reinforce it...9-0.


62 posted on 02/10/2017 5:48:46 PM PST by JPJones (George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

Reassign the states within the 9th to other judicial districts—place the states of California, Washington and so forth into districts with a conservative track record. Erase all vestiges of the 9th for incompetence, based on their 85% record of exhibiting poor judgement.


63 posted on 02/10/2017 5:48:51 PM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

True. They never even quoted the USC Title and Section #’s or the CFR.


64 posted on 02/10/2017 5:49:12 PM PST by Lumper20 (Muslims, Latinos, Asians etc. Assimilate means learn English plus OUR WAYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

True. They never even quoted the USC Title and Section #’s or the CFR.


65 posted on 02/10/2017 5:49:14 PM PST by Lumper20 (Muslims, Latinos, Asians etc. Assimilate means learn English plus OUR WAYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

True. They never even quoted the USC Title and Section #’s or the CFR.


66 posted on 02/10/2017 5:49:14 PM PST by Lumper20 (Muslims, Latinos, Asians etc. Assimilate means learn English plus OUR WAYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
without actually referring to the executive order itself

Or the legislative act of the congress that authorized the executive order.

67 posted on 02/10/2017 5:49:45 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Are you thinking what I’m thinking??? Trump played them...he wanted his ‘ban’ to work and knew he had to play this way first, they messed up and now he has them by the (whatevers)....

While they are playing ‘fish’ President Trump is playing 3 D Chess...


68 posted on 02/10/2017 5:50:02 PM PST by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

WTF? The three stooges are now asking the full 9th district court to pull their stupid fat asses out of the fire.


69 posted on 02/10/2017 5:50:14 PM PST by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Trump needs to dramatically increase the number of federal judges. Outnumber the libs 10 to 1 and should get criminal cases done in a faster manner.


70 posted on 02/10/2017 5:50:41 PM PST by RedWulf (TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

How were the 3 judges chosen for the panel?


71 posted on 02/10/2017 5:50:59 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: technically right
Here they are.


72 posted on 02/10/2017 5:51:46 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

Did the three 9th judges think that was going to be the end of this issue? Maybe in the 2-dimensional universe their minds dwell within. Once the statute is brought forward for the 1st time their emotional reasoning is crushed. They’re running grade-school Pop Warner plays against the winner of the Superbowl.


73 posted on 02/10/2017 5:51:59 PM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JPJones

Actually it would be more like 27-0, if your view is correct.

This is their one shot at redemption, and it is coming from within, not as a request by the any of the parties involved.

Highly unusual.


74 posted on 02/10/2017 5:52:21 PM PST by exit82 (The opposition has already been Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
How were the 3 judges chosen for the panel?

It's supposed to be random. 2 sitting judges and 1 senior judge. I think we know which one is the senior judge.

75 posted on 02/10/2017 5:52:49 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Put AZ in the fifth and create a new one for Alaska,Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington.


76 posted on 02/10/2017 5:53:05 PM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

The 9th circuit cannot begin to argue it is a court of law when a 3-judge panel upholds a decision without any reference to much less analysis of the law in force, the statutory interpretation, according to accepted cannons of interpretation, an analysis of the applicability to the order, and an effort to determine which parts of the order might be in violation of which parts of the statute and further any effort to conform the statute to the U.S. constitution.

*************************************************

That’s why I don’t think Trump should give them another chance. They have no intention of reversing the decision, they just want a chance to clean up their mess and actually try to site some law with a better written decision.


77 posted on 02/10/2017 5:54:37 PM PST by kara37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

So the Court, on its own motion, is essentially trying to appeal its own ruling?

Bizarre. Sounds like maybe an attempt to get another hearing so they can create another round of super negative news stories for the President with another ruling against him.


78 posted on 02/10/2017 5:56:01 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Black robed politicians are part of the swamp most people aren’t looking at. Fortunately President Trump is.


79 posted on 02/10/2017 5:57:41 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: exit82
it is coming from within, not as a request by the any of the parties involved. Highly unusual.

This sua sponte motion for an en banc review must be causing a lot of late night oil burning at Justice trying to figure out what their next move is. One could suggest that this reduces the game to one of two outcomes: 1. they reverse the lower courts and allow the order to stand while the lower court hears the case, or 2. They affirm, after writing a much stronger opinion, and force DOJ to go to the Supreme Court [because of the weight of precedent established].

80 posted on 02/10/2017 5:57:44 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson