Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judges Declare Judges Can Grant Immigration Visas, Even When Elected President Disagrees
Breitbart ^ | 02/09/17 | Neil Munro

Posted on 02/10/2017 6:08:12 AM PST by Enlightened1

Judges in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California are opening a new immigration route for foreigners, which would bypass the federal agencies’ sole authority to approve or decline foreigners’ immigration or entry into the U.S. The new route is created by the Feb. 9 decision which blocks the White House’s very popular reform of immigration rules.

If upheld by the Supreme Court later this year, the new declaration would allow overseas foreigners — including those hostile to the United States — to hire lawyers to persuade judges to grant them visas, residency permits and eventually citizenship. That courtroom route would bypass denials or approvals from the elected President’s administration and its subordinate agencies, including the intelligence, law-enforcement and national security agencies.

In practice, the decision would give foreigners the right to sue the federal government when they’re denied entry by the federal government. That right, when pressed by many migrants, will ensure that some gain entry to the United States despite opposition from the voters and their chosen government.

That created right to sue for immigration rights would also give the nation’s corps of immigration lawyers more opportunities to trade U.S. citizenship to foreigners in exchange for lawyers’ fees.

Currently, immigration lawyers bring 1 million immigrants and roughly 1 million contract workers into the Unite States each year, where they compete against native-born Americans for jobs, economic benefits, and political power. At least 165 million foreigners, including 6.2 million Mexicans, want to migrate to the United States, according to a 2009 survey by Gallup. Currently, the U.S. population is roughly 320 million.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigration; judges; trump; visas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: FlipWilson

The President swore an oath to uphold the Constitution he has to ignore the 9th Circus ruling.


41 posted on 02/10/2017 6:47:44 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Problem with starting World War II is that you’ll be fighting American liberals plus the influx of immigrants from across the globe that would equals a losing battle! The only thing we have left is to seek out God to help us! Or start a new country elsewhere ! America’s tug of war rope is about to snap in half and it ain’t going to be a pretty sight! We have all the liberals in charge of our defense and everything in DC from the OVOMIT administration... it’s going to get really really bad. This weekend my husband and I plan to go get more ammo and an extra gun to protect ourselves and our family! The evil demon Liberals are desperate and they have tasted blood by the murdering of our police officers they will come after us next that is a given! It’s time to AMMO up!


42 posted on 02/10/2017 6:47:53 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The globalists plan is to let in enough of these vermin so that nobody wants to migrate here anymore. It’s working.


43 posted on 02/10/2017 6:49:52 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Since they like Mexicans coming here so much, we need to treat them as if they were in Mexico...Judge, you didn’t do what the people want, so come with us...(Judge never to be seen again)...Sharks a little less hungry today...


44 posted on 02/10/2017 6:52:03 AM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
WHO does the impeaching?

Congress, any citizen ?

45 posted on 02/10/2017 6:53:07 AM PST by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas
And that is grounds for impeachment. And we have a president that will pursue such a thin.

I dunno. None of those so-called judges looked very thin.

46 posted on 02/10/2017 6:57:22 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Love Trumping Hate" sure involves a lot more assault and arson than I expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Sorry, but legally, this is no big deal. It is simply a TRO granted under the 200+ year precedence going back to Marbury v. Madison.

I don’t like it, but it’s legally sound until SCOTUS reverses.


47 posted on 02/10/2017 6:57:50 AM PST by Strac6 ("We sleep safe in our beds only because rough men stand ready to visit violence on the enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Yeah, it’s way past time for the ones not keeping their nose in their own business and failing to facilitate other elected officials to do theirs. They have no brief to take on executive powers.


48 posted on 02/10/2017 6:59:32 AM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Problem with starting World War II is that

Problem with starting World War II is that we'd be 78 years too late.

49 posted on 02/10/2017 7:00:12 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Love Trumping Hate" sure involves a lot more assault and arson than I expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

I don’t agree with the decision but that was not the ruling.


50 posted on 02/10/2017 7:00:44 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Exactly, I think the government should have asked the judges what office they plan to create in the Seattle court house to handle American foreign policy and national security, so families of dead Americans can hold them responsible.


51 posted on 02/10/2017 7:03:12 AM PST by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Sorry...LOL!! Meant CIVIL WAR II. too early..need more caffeine! ...😜
52 posted on 02/10/2017 7:03:22 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Hopefully Trump et al have a long game. but it better be a good one because, at this point, his response to the initial court is doing great damage to law and order.


53 posted on 02/10/2017 7:03:37 AM PST by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areukiddingme1

54 posted on 02/10/2017 7:03:54 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Ninth Circuit declares war on the United States.


55 posted on 02/10/2017 7:04:29 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Buy up a house or two in these judges neighborhoods and load them up with refugees. Then tell the refugees they are not going to get any public assistance, so if they need anything go to that house over there.


56 posted on 02/10/2017 7:04:29 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areukiddingme1

Damned straight!


57 posted on 02/10/2017 7:05:40 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

I’m not saying it was but that is the ultimate goal.


58 posted on 02/10/2017 7:12:27 AM PST by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

IIRC, the writers of the Constitution had a problem with the Judiciary Branch because their was no check on that branch. But they never made some kind of check and consequently, this is where we are....


59 posted on 02/10/2017 7:15:16 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

Yes. Trump can rewrite EO IAW that statue and their ruling is moot.


60 posted on 02/10/2017 7:20:51 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson