Posted on 02/09/2017 3:48:23 PM PST by monkapotamus
Someone mentioned it here earlier...apply the extreme vetting at the origin instead of the destination. Order the US consulates in the 7 countries to issue visas only one day per week and slow walk it so that only a few visas a day are issued.
I didn’t mean long run. You should know me better than that. But anyone who thinks we’ll get a good immediate judicial outcome is dreaming. It will go to a 4-4 USSC and be remanded, or idiot Kennedy will vote against us.
Better to wait on the appeal until Gorsuch is seated.
That said, Trump has been way, way too canny in all of his moves to not have foreseen this. He has always been 2 steps ahead, and I’m betting they knew the 9th would do this, they know what the USSC will rule, so the real question is, what’s up their sleeves?
So true. This is why they had a Clinton Foundation...payoffs, favors, buying people off.
Doesn’t matter how over the top a legal ruling is, if the person wearing the robe is paid off, a pedophile, they’ll do whatever the F.
This has been the RINO mantra on Twitter by Shapiro, Guy Benson, and others, that Trump “rushed” this.
Well, no. The fact is, once word starts leaking the other side mobilizes the entire bureaucracy and even RINO legislators and then it doesn’t happen at all. I’m convinced if he had waited for Sessions, it never even would have been issued.
Patton: “l’audace, l’audace, toujours l’audace!”
No I was suggesting what his next twitter should be.
Yup, at the extreme example, you’ve stated that perfectly.
Sadly, for some crazy reason, Trump decided to ask them “if it was ok”?
Second it.
Go Trump!
There is no such law.
Come on. Don’t you people get it? The law could be PERFECTLY drafted (Trump read the section of LAW in his speech) and
IT. DOESN’T. MATTER.
They aren’t ruling on laws, fool-proof or otherwise.
Didn’t Andrew Jackson have a supreme court decision go against him and make a statement along the lines of “They’ve made their decision now lets see them enforce it”.
Appeal to Heaven
Until the new justice is a part of the USSC.
“As the missiles from our enemies rain down on our country. President will have to ask some liberal judges whether he can press the return button——that is the end result to what these fools have done-—sleep well”
Correct. That is the logical conclusion to draw, as these judges are using terms such as bringing “due process” here. Also, Trump’s retaliation to the missiles might create some imagined “harm” to the states of Washington and Minnesota, so he couldn’t respond.
The courts have basically codified a “right to emigrate” to this country no matter what.
For now.
For now.
Well, that quote about the past may be true, but sadly it sets the stage for potential violence.
Unless the next hand is played correctly, should Trump have the appearance of being a dictator the left has much needed ammo to riot, protest, and attack the Republic.
The left was literally on its deathbed. This sadly has given them an energy and direction they desperately needed. This is practically like having the Allies surrender the troops at the Battle of the Bulge.
I cannot believe this is happening. I was hoping for Trump to have an answer this evening. Instead, he “tweets”....see you in court. Well, we just left there, and it wasn’t pretty...
Only way to save this, is to have him block all immigration effectively immediately, and repeat his written authority over, and over, and over... and threaten anyone that stands in the way with imprisonment. And that’s going to need to happen TOMORROW...
Not only did that judge have no legal right to issue the proclamation he did, but no court has jurisdiction over an EO declared by a sitting President.
Now he's been bamboozled into thinking that he has to abide by the crooked corrupt 9th circuit decision to stop his perfectly legal and applicable Executive order
Alexander Hamilton agrees with this.
This is all a big farce, it's #fakenews. The judicial has no power to attack the president the way they are.
In Federalist Paper #78, Alexander Hamilton stated, in part:Trump and his people need to enforce the ban and ignore the court challenges as they have NO RIGHT to do so."It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power 1; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible care is requisite to enable it to defend itself against their attacks. It equally proves, that though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the Legislature and the Executive. For I agree, that "there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers."
2 And it proves, in the last place, that as liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone, but would have every thing to fear from its union with either of the other departments.
1. The celebrated Montesquieu, speaking of them, says: "Of the three powers above mentioned, the judiciary is next to nothing." Spirit of Laws. Vol. I, page 186.
Issue new order every hour until the court is swAmped..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.