Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txrefugee

When you hear these women proclaiming that it is their body and they can do what they want, I strongly disagree. In the first place, when their babies are conceived, the new tissue contains two strands of DNA. It is a new creation, not solely from themselves, but from both father and mother. Unless it was tissue created by themselves (via cloning), or a cancerous tumor, they claim ownership by possesion only, and in fact, could be disputed legally (and has been.) As a matter of faith, that soul was a gift from God and will return to him. I believe that women have a right of self destruction if they so chose, but they do not have the right destroy a new life that was created with part of both father and mother, with the inability of the new life to chose.


32 posted on 01/22/2017 12:47:39 PM PST by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: richardtavor

Very, very well said.

I wonder how many prospective fathers long for their missing children. They have a choice, too. But their wishes apparently don’t count.


55 posted on 01/22/2017 2:45:46 PM PST by proud American in Canada (May God Bless the U.S.A. (Trump: I will bear the slings and arrows for you, the American people))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson