Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne
Thought we have the newkler option.
6 posted on 01/22/2017 7:43:32 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: servantboy777

Not on this.Reid didnt include it


18 posted on 01/22/2017 7:46:27 AM PST by RummyChick (Trump Train Hobo TM Rummychick. Example - Ryan Romney Kasich. Quit trying to Jump on the Train)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: servantboy777

Nope.

Not on the Supremes.

2/3’s are required.

BUT...it’s the only card Chucky holds. (though a high card)
All the repubs have to do is force him to give up that card.

If he wants to play in anything else for at least 2 years, he’ll need to give up that card.
Trump is good at painting the picture outside of the media.
He can paint Schumer (and the dems) as purely obstructionist.

Remember, the repubs played ball with the dems, for Kagan and Sotomayor.

Time to call those markers in,
If Schumer and company want to see any cushy committee seats.


55 posted on 01/22/2017 8:13:43 AM PST by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: servantboy777

Not on Supreme Court justices


62 posted on 01/22/2017 8:18:35 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson