Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Eyes 10% Spending Cuts, 20% Slash Of Federal Workers
The Washington Examiner ^ | 01/17/17 | PAUL BEDARD

Posted on 01/17/2017 6:49:57 AM PST by Enlightened1

Making good on a promise to slash government, President-elect Trump has asked his incoming team to pursue spending and staffing cuts.

Insiders said that the spending reductions in some departments could go as high as 10 percent and staff cuts to 20 percent, numbers that would rock Washington if he follows through.

At least two so-called "landing teams" in Cabinet agencies have relayed the call for cuts as part of their marching orders to shrink the flab in government.

The cuts would target discretionary spending, not mandated programs such as Medicare or Social Security, the sources said.

The spending reductions are expected to be used to help pay for Trump's plan to boost the Pentagon's budget, tax cuts and some pet projects, potentially including the anti-immigration wall on the nation's southern border.

The teams also are looking at staffing cuts over four years through attrition, a hiring freeze and reorganization.

The plan is winning cheers in conservative, anti-tax and anti-spending corners in Washington that have long sought massive cuts in the bureaucracy.

Presidents rarely cut spending, choosing freezes instead. In the meantime, federal spending has reached historic levels. Trump has picked a budget hawk, Rep. Mick Mulvaney, to head the Office of Management and Budget, a clear sign that spending cuts are a top priority.

Still, Trump is likely to face a wall of opposition from Democrats and federal unions who consider much of the federal workforce on their side.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; cut; federal; federalworkers; trump; trumpspendingcuts; workers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: Enlightened1

How will they survive? OH NOES!

81 posted on 01/17/2017 8:10:29 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

you mean non-working.........


82 posted on 01/17/2017 8:11:52 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Cuts? I believe what he means by cuts is a reduction in the amount of growth of the baseline budget and we are fully prepared to work with the President on that.


83 posted on 01/17/2017 8:14:04 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
I agree with you. Cereal and milk....and get out to the bus....

Make your own damn lunch...tuna, bologna, pb&j....is that so hard??

84 posted on 01/17/2017 8:14:39 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

You can’t make America great again without popping the leeches off the taxpayers’ necks. Go Trump!


85 posted on 01/17/2017 8:16:13 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfony1
Over 60 percent of federal spending is entitlements, and that is where virtually all the growth is to be found. Another 16 percent is defense, which Trump wants to increase. Federal domestic discretionary spending certainly has programs that can be cut, but it also includes the Coast Guard, the National Park Service, NASA, the FBI, the federal court system, the border patrol (don't think Trump wants to cut that), federal transportation spending, and so on. Most of this is the "good government" stuff that we all take for granted. These are the routine functions that government should be doing, and can do competently. They are being cannibalized to put off the reckoning on entitlements. That's a losers' game.

Sure, we could raise a big pot of change if we eliminated federal highway spending while keeping the federal gasoline tax in place, and putting the receipts into the general fund. Let the states pick up the slack. We can trim some chump change at USDA, but most of USDA's budget is food stamps, and that's an entitlement. We could walk away from NASA; Obama already killed the manned space program, so we could content ourselves with bumming rides from the Russians and save enough money to finance a few weeks of the expected growth in Medicare and Medicaid spending. But you are simply not going to find enough money in these areas to make the slightest difference if entitlements aren't reined in.

86 posted on 01/17/2017 8:16:58 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

I agree with you in principle.

But I think President Trump has to pick his targets very carefully, since he can be sure that a firestorm of resistance will launched by the media, the Democrats and the RINOs. IMHO, President Trump cannot afford to “lose” many of these fights.

For example, those entities now claim that the Federal Elections Commission failed America in the last election. OK, then! Shrink it! Eliminate its power to meddle in state and local elections! Consider if that commission needs to exist at all!

And so forth...


87 posted on 01/17/2017 8:27:31 AM PST by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I hope this happens...Trump also needs to target the pension system of federal workers


88 posted on 01/17/2017 8:28:40 AM PST by SPRINK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I hope this happens...Trump also needs to target the pension system of federal workers


89 posted on 01/17/2017 8:28:47 AM PST by SPRINK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Trump Administration should triple these figures....

Federal Unions, Government Unions are illegal.....Regan proved that much.

GO TRUMP GO!! -— DRAIN IT and POUR DRAIN-O down the Drain!!


90 posted on 01/17/2017 8:34:26 AM PST by EnglishOnly (Fight all out to win OR get out now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“The teams also are looking at staffing cuts over four years through attrition, a hiring freeze and reorganization.”

NO! I am a babyboomer, and I want it RIGHT NOW! :-)


91 posted on 01/17/2017 8:59:46 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djpg

“If people fear for their jobs they will perform better.”

Maybe true, but for a government worker, that might be a 1% improvement. Dump ‘em!


92 posted on 01/17/2017 9:01:43 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana; bigbob
decimation

I wish we could impose REAL Roman decimation on federal workers in certain agencies. Start with the EPA/IRS/ATF:


93 posted on 01/17/2017 9:06:14 AM PST by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

LOL! Dilbert is the BEST!!


94 posted on 01/17/2017 9:13:23 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

It needs to be done! Anything less is what got us into this mess to begin with.


95 posted on 01/17/2017 9:16:59 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

The nice thing about real layoffs, is that under civil service seniority rules, the last hired would be the most vulnerable.

So everybody hired during the Obama administration could potentially be eliminated.


96 posted on 01/17/2017 9:19:25 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

To make this necessary reduction in government popular it needs to get the support of taxpayers: Make it tangible

For every 100 million in savings, provide electronic tax credits to people who can add them up throughout the year and use them the following year on their taxes.


97 posted on 01/17/2017 9:20:19 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

I agree, but it will take amazing courage and power. I’m concerned that there is nobody with that combination.

And, truth be told, if someone DOES have that much courage and power, I start worrying about revelation unfolding before us.


98 posted on 01/17/2017 9:22:15 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

If the Average American worker doesn’t get Retirement monies in their Paycheck neither should Federal Employees.
Case Closed.


99 posted on 01/17/2017 9:23:40 AM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
I’ve always thought that instead of encouraging pork barrel spending so a rep can justify his or her reelection

You realize that the first thing these guys did was meet behind closed doors and vote to restore earmarks right? Trump shamed them publicly and they backed down but it will come back.

100 posted on 01/17/2017 9:29:22 AM PST by itsahoot (Five words I want to hear, I will build that wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson