Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rellimpank

—and , fta—

“Recreational shooters and hunters would like to have silencers because they don’t want to damage their hearing but dislike using ear protection. If the Occupational Safety and Health Administration had been around in the 1930s, gun rights lawyer Stephen Halbrook quipped to The Washington Post, it probably would have mandated their use.”


2 posted on 01/14/2017 5:43:19 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank

There are many ranges in Europe where suppressors are mandatory to deal with noise pollution.


4 posted on 01/14/2017 5:46:06 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

I suffered from hearing loss, and can attribute it partially to target shooting without hearing protection as a young man (many years ago). I am ready to move to suppressors when this ridiculous “tax” on them is repealed.


15 posted on 01/14/2017 6:09:48 AM PST by Dubh_Ghlase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

I guess we could go back to screwing a two liter soda pop bottle on the muzzle.


29 posted on 01/14/2017 7:52:30 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson