You mean like the “fake but accurate’ report that got your ass fired?
The dumb$hit had the nerve to say of that incident “we got to the truth but we paid a high price”
NO YOU DIDN’T YOU SACK ‘O CRAP - YOU MADE UP A FAKE STORY AND REPORTED IT AS TRUTH.
NO YOU DIDN’T YOU SACK ‘O CRAP - YOU MADE UP A FAKE STORY AND REPORTED IT AS TRUTH.
Let’s be real here. I am all about truth, even if it doesn’t make us look good.
Rather was onto the truth. W Bush was a total flake in the Guard. He used MANY excuses to miss showing up. Daddy had to come up with all kinds of crap to keep him “politically viable.” Let’s admit that Rather was right: his evidence was FAKE but the story was accurate.
Dan Libtard didn’t just report a false story, he tried to steal the 2004 election.
The libtards ALMOST took the 2000 election with a late released October Surprise. The election eve release of Bush’s decades old DWI arrest cost him the so-called Popular Vote. It almost cost him the election.
Dan Rather was “rushed” to bringing his “scoop” to the nightly news because AP was going to press with it. AP was ALSO in on it and gets forgotten in this mix. If the libtards had held their ginned up forgeries for a few more weeks, they might have swayed the election. As it was, they stifled reports of the controversy that they were FORGED photocopies (so the veracity of the handwriting didn’t matter for sh!t) for 3 days. Home viewers were not exposed to any questioning the documents for 3 days.