NO YOU DIDNT YOU SACK O CRAP - YOU MADE UP A FAKE STORY AND REPORTED IT AS TRUTH.
Let’s be real here. I am all about truth, even if it doesn’t make us look good.
Rather was onto the truth. W Bush was a total flake in the Guard. He used MANY excuses to miss showing up. Daddy had to come up with all kinds of crap to keep him “politically viable.” Let’s admit that Rather was right: his evidence was FAKE but the story was accurate.
Yaelle, what is your proof? Or should we just accept your word on it? If we accept your word, why don’t we accept the word of Dan Rather?
What is your proof that the story was “accurate”?
Rather was lying to Americans with impunity for years. He was quite comfortable in the practice as were many others.
The heart of the story was the fake news, not Bush’s flaws.
Point is, Yaelle, you want it to be true, and it may be true (as many things are without hard evidence) but if you want to draw the line somewhere, where are you going to draw it?
If we decide your word is good on the absence of proof, then...who decides whose word is good?
The Republican Party? The Democratic Party? Obama? Yaelle?
According to who?
Dan Rather?
I was in the Reserves, my brother and father were in the national guard.
There were ALWAYS things being done to shift around your schedules on the duty roster because unless you led a pretty quiet personal life there was always something coming up. And the Bush’s did not lead a normal life.
If Bush skipped out for no reason or showed up drunk tell us where you got this information. The same place Dan Rather did?
“Lets be real here. I am all about truth, even if it doesnt make us look good.
Rather was onto the truth. W Bush was a total flake in the Guard. He used MANY excuses to miss showing up. Daddy had to come up with all kinds of crap to keep him politically viable. Lets admit that Rather was right: his evidence was FAKE but the story was accurate.”
Can you prove that stupid statement?