Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K

NO YOU DIDN’T YOU SACK ‘O CRAP - YOU MADE UP A FAKE STORY AND REPORTED IT AS TRUTH.


Let’s be real here. I am all about truth, even if it doesn’t make us look good.

Rather was onto the truth. W Bush was a total flake in the Guard. He used MANY excuses to miss showing up. Daddy had to come up with all kinds of crap to keep him “politically viable.” Let’s admit that Rather was right: his evidence was FAKE but the story was accurate.


26 posted on 01/04/2017 12:08:15 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle

Yaelle, what is your proof? Or should we just accept your word on it? If we accept your word, why don’t we accept the word of Dan Rather?

What is your proof that the story was “accurate”?


29 posted on 01/04/2017 12:13:53 PM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle
Let’s admit that Rather was right: his evidence was FAKE but the story was accurate.

-----------------------------------------------

Where's the evidence of that? He had a whole group of Air Guard that served with him and created a website "Wingmen for Bush." I spoke to one of them back then who served with Bush and he said Bush served honorably. The site is no longer up.
30 posted on 01/04/2017 12:14:52 PM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle

Rather was lying to Americans with impunity for years. He was quite comfortable in the practice as were many others.

The heart of the story was the fake news, not Bush’s flaws.


31 posted on 01/04/2017 12:15:22 PM PST by Radix (Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle

Point is, Yaelle, you want it to be true, and it may be true (as many things are without hard evidence) but if you want to draw the line somewhere, where are you going to draw it?

If we decide your word is good on the absence of proof, then...who decides whose word is good?

The Republican Party? The Democratic Party? Obama? Yaelle?


33 posted on 01/04/2017 12:19:17 PM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle

According to who?
Dan Rather?


52 posted on 01/04/2017 12:53:25 PM PST by Mr. K ( Trump kicked her ass 2-to-1 if you remove all the voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle

I was in the Reserves, my brother and father were in the national guard.

There were ALWAYS things being done to shift around your schedules on the duty roster because unless you led a pretty quiet personal life there was always something coming up. And the Bush’s did not lead a normal life.

If Bush skipped out for no reason or showed up drunk tell us where you got this information. The same place Dan Rather did?


55 posted on 01/04/2017 1:17:55 PM PST by Mr. K ( Trump kicked her ass 2-to-1 if you remove all the voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle

“Let’s be real here. I am all about truth, even if it doesn’t make us look good.
Rather was onto the truth. W Bush was a total flake in the Guard. He used MANY excuses to miss showing up. Daddy had to come up with all kinds of crap to keep him “politically viable.” Let’s admit that Rather was right: his evidence was FAKE but the story was accurate.”

Can you prove that stupid statement?


56 posted on 01/04/2017 1:19:17 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson