Posted on 01/01/2017 9:58:22 AM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
The Clinton's were not moderates. They are harder Left than Obama and the Clintons did far more lasting damage than Obama can.
Hillary Clinton especially.
The Clinton's are just better politicians and they are more interested in money and personal power
The big difference is that Bill Clinton was a genius at knowing just how far and how fast he push the country before it revolted. Hillary and Obama do not have these instincts.
It will be another “White Lash” nth is guy is an embarrassment but opps he is on CNN so he fits in
We applaud their efforts to move further left. But at the same time, it is sad to realize the young minds they will further corrupt in the process.
They follow the Dem playbook as if it were inspired scripture.
In the beginning there was Marx...
Perhaps, but only in California and New York; unless they see the new light and come to their senses.
“The Clintons aren’t going anywhere.”
When half the world’s despots have a target on your back for pay wo/play, you can bet the Clintons and Obama will be continue corrupting the left and the right (McCain, Graham and Ryan are almost to obvious to mention).
Massive riots and vote buying will pockmark the next 4 years.
Sounds like Vanno wants a CHOCOLATE AMERICA!!!! Could very well be a CHOCOLATE ISLAM AMERICA in a generation or two the way all the “being brought in to INVADE us.refugees”
Go left young RAT, go left.
I hope going forward there is a way to keep an eye on the Clintons as I want the entertainment of those who donated wanting their money back.
Oh, so VJ's answer is to go FARTHER LEFT.
LOL!
Still hoping for the ticket of Weiner - Holder, just for the comedic value.
That's hilarious.
Moslems are "progressive"?
I guess if you mean moving from the Stone Age to the Bronze age.
Kamala’s political fortune rose after ‘fajitagate.’
Fisticuffs over fajitas stands high atop SFPD ... “Fajitagate” started as a street brawl over an order of fajitas and grew into a scandal that toppled two San Fran politicians.
“Keith Ellison represents the progressive wing of the party.” Ohhhh yeah. If being dragged back to the dark ages by sharia law is progressive, then he’s your guy.
In bizarro land, HRC is a moderate.
You are absolutely right. Democrats need to go hard left, loud and proud. America will follow, if Democrats will just trust their instincts and take that hard left turn.
I would love to know what Valerie Jarrett has been up to since the election. She’s been awfully quiet lately.
Last time I saw her publicly, she was standing on the front porch of the White House frowning with her arms crossed.
Val was surrounded by a dozen or so other frowning, weeping ,disappointed Dems who were informed that the Hildabeast had ‘gone down’ in flames - AGAIN!
No More Kennedys, Clinton's or maybe the Obama's
Elizabeth Warren is now past sell by date as the American people have seen her too long
I recall that vaguely. I think their was a Police Chief and his Police Officer son both involved. Both left the department, and I presume the force over one foolish moment.
>>that’s going to throw blacks under the bus for criminal justice reform, and for prison expansion
When Democrats think prison, they think blacks. And WE’RE the racists?
Maybe Van Jones should focus his party on MAGA so blacks can get good jobs and stop committing crimes. As I explained to a Prog friend several months ago, I’m not voting for Trump because he’s promising anything I need. I have a very secure job in utility infrastructure. I’m voting Trump for poor people who want real jobs. I voted to help blacks a helluva lot more than Van Jones ever did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.