Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA tells U.S. cities — it's illegal to use dry ice to kill rats
digitaljournal.com ^ | Nov 25, 2016 | Karen Graham

Posted on 12/29/2016 6:07:10 PM PST by daniel1212

Major cities in the U.S., including New York, Boston, Chicago, and others, began using dry ice several months ago in an effort to reduce rodent populations that had increased considerably after last year's warm winter, and it proved to be very effective. USA Today is reporting that in some cities, there has been a 95 percent reduction in the number of rodents using dry ice.

The rather chilling extermination method involves dropping dry ice, frozen carbon dioxide, into rat burrows and then stuffing the openings with newspapers and dirt. As the dry ice melts, carbon dioxide gas is released, suffocating the rodents, leaving them to decompose in their holes, away from humans.

The dry ice method is efficient and cheap, say officials in cities where it has been tested. Chicago launched its dry ice program in August this year and saw an immediate 60 percent reduction in rat populations. They also say dry ice is very cost effective, costing around 50 cents a pound compared to rat poison pellets that run $57.00 for a 20-pound bucket....

The EPA says that with any product used as a pesticide or rodenticide, it must be vetted for public safety, highlighting the complicated process of approving the use of pesticide use in this country. And states must enforce federal guidelines if the EPA cites any violations. The use of dry ice in controlling rodent populations came to the EPA's attention after the news media gave the rat killing method widespread coverage. Many municipalities and school districts contacted the EPA, asking about the legality of using dry ice.

Other consumer groups wanted to know if cities using dry ice had created any guidelines to ensure the product was being safely handled by employees.

And then People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) stepped into the fray, saying rodents "deserve our protection."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: dryice; epa; nannystate; rats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: daniel1212
As the dry ice melts

Not being picky but dry ice does not melt. It sublimes. It goes directly from the solid state to gas.

Nonetheless; it is a good way to kill rodents if you can confine them.

41 posted on 12/29/2016 6:40:25 PM PST by super7man (Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

But of course it’s perfectly fine for EPA itself to stupidly release millions of gallons of heavy metal laden mine tailings into the Animas River basin poisoning untold fish, wildlife and farm/ranch animals along with hundreds of thousand humans water supplies and irrigation for food growth and animal feed. That EPA, right ?


42 posted on 12/29/2016 6:43:33 PM PST by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teacherwoes

PETA might adapt that, but consider:

Alberta is one of only two Canadian provinces with no sea access, and was settled relatively late in North American history. The black rat cannot survive in its climate at all, and brown rats must live near people and their structures. They cannot evade the numerous predators in natural areas or survive the winters in farm fields. It took until 1950 for invading rats to make their way to Alberta over land from Eastern Canada.[71] Immediately upon their arrival at the eastern border with Saskatchewan, the Alberta government implemented an extremely aggressive rat control program to stop them from advancing further.

A systematic detection and eradication system was used throughout a control zone about 600 kilometres (400 mi) long and 30 kilometres (20 mi) wide along the eastern border of the province to eliminate rat infestations before the rats could spread further into the province. Shotguns, bulldozers, high explosives, poison gas, and incendiaries were used to destroy rats. Numerous farm buildings were destroyed in the process. Initially, tons of arsenic trioxide were spread around thousands of farm yards to poison rats, but soon after the program commenced the rodenticide and medical drug warfarin was introduced, which is much safer for people (it is a commonly prescribed medicine), and more effective at killing rats than arsenic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat


43 posted on 12/29/2016 6:43:44 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

I was going to suggest a propane-air mixture with remote ignition as more fun than Cold CO2, but guessed that the outbuildings might be at risk....


44 posted on 12/29/2016 6:49:17 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

“And then People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) stepped into the fray, saying rodents “deserve our protection.”

Huh?


45 posted on 12/29/2016 6:49:54 PM PST by semaj (Audentes fortuna juvat: Fortune favors the bold. Be Bold FRiends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Catch rats in a live trap and take them to EPA office and turn loose.


46 posted on 12/29/2016 6:52:08 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Willie Sutton went into robbing banks and Hillary Clinton went into politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The EPA of Europe back in 1347 was also against dry ice to kill rats. The Black Plague followed..... True story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death


47 posted on 12/29/2016 6:53:01 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
"USA Today is reporting that in some cities, there has been a 95 percent reduction in the number of rodents using dry ice."

Damn those dry ice using rodents. . . maybe we should just convert them to using regular water ice? Or perhaps they have just moved on to heavier drug use

Good "catch!"

48 posted on 12/29/2016 6:55:14 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: redcatcherb412
But of course it’s perfectly fine for EPA itself to stupidly release millions of gallons of heavy metal laden mine tailings into the Animas River basin poisoning untold fish, wildlife and farm/ranch animals along with hundreds of thousand humans water supplies and irrigation for food growth and animal feed. That EPA, right ?

They should have received one of their own heavy fines.

49 posted on 12/29/2016 6:56:47 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
...there has been a 95 percent reduction in the number of rodents using dry ice.
That's great. I never would have guessed, though, that there were so many rodents using dry ice that it would be a problem in the first place. :=)
50 posted on 12/29/2016 7:02:25 PM PST by Bob (Now, Republicans get to sing "Happy Days Are Here Again". Enjoy the suck, rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

Maybe we should disband the EPA.

We used to use propane in ground squirrel burrows they were digging in our earth-fill dams.

Worked pretty good against NVA tunnel complexes also.


51 posted on 12/29/2016 7:04:27 PM PST by x1stcav (Leftism is like rust: It corrodes 24 hours a day until eradicated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

EPA missed the key angle. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. This causes global warming and therefore the method must be banned!


52 posted on 12/29/2016 7:04:29 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

“there has been a 95 percent reduction in the number of rodents using dry ice.”

Interesting. The more dry ice the put out, the more the rodents are using it.


53 posted on 12/29/2016 7:04:58 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Where does it say it is illegal?


54 posted on 12/29/2016 7:07:18 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

“I’ll have to pass this on to friends of mine who have been dealing with woodchucks in their lawn for years.”
They sell dry ice at most grocery stores. Moles and other burrowing varmits could be removed VI’s this technique.


55 posted on 12/29/2016 7:08:04 PM PST by 9422WMR (President Trump, I like the sound of that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
there has been a 95 percent reduction in the number of rodents using dry ice.

Just what were the rodents using the dry ice for?

56 posted on 12/29/2016 7:10:41 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: super7man
Not being picky but dry ice does not melt. It sublimes. It goes directly from the solid state to gas. Nonetheless; it is a good way to kill rodents if you can confine them.

The key is to find the exit. Car exhaust would be even cheaper but that would have to be registered and approved as a pesticide, along with anything else.

57 posted on 12/29/2016 7:11:26 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

EPA would arrest him and jail him.


58 posted on 12/29/2016 7:11:58 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
The Rodenator would be more fun than dry ice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIMfir6r1Rc

59 posted on 12/29/2016 7:12:14 PM PST by Rebelbase (ABC/NBC/CBS/MSNBC/PBS/CNN/FOX are THE LEGACY MEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Why would you describe as “well meaning”, something you called “regulatory excess”? How do you know the motives behind this government diktat? Population control is an EPA objective and there is nothing well meaning about it.


60 posted on 12/29/2016 7:12:33 PM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson