“Madeline Dunham filed the paperwork which automatically generated those newspaper announcements. Hawaiian law allowed up to a year for the child to be examined by a physician in order to claim Hawaiian birth.”
However “up to a year” is irrelevant since Obama’s mother, not grandmother, signed the certificate for the birth on August 7, 1961 and Dr. Sinclair signed the certificate on August 8, 1961 for a birth that occurred at 7:24 pm on Friday August 4, 1961. The birth was reported a week later (August 13, 1961) in the newspaper.
Here’s the only “paperwork.” When an expectant mother checks in to the hospital a Certificate of Live Birth is generated with a pre-stamped registration number. After the child is born, the attending physician and the mother sign the Certificate of Live Birth and it goes to a Local Registrar who stamps it and signs it. Verna K.L. Lee who was the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate is still alive and living in a nursing home.
The newspapers get their “Health Bureau Statistics” data from that process.
If someone can find proof of delayed registration of the birth, that would be big.
The only proof for your assertions is a document that has been demonstrated to be fake. (And clearly so in my opinion.)
Here’s the only “paperwork.” When an expectant mother checks in to the hospital a Certificate of Live Birth is generated with a pre-stamped registration number. After the child is born, the attending physician and the mother sign the Certificate of Live Birth and it goes to a Local Registrar who stamps it and signs it. Verna K.L. Lee who was the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate is still alive and living in a nursing home.
The normal process does not preclude the occurrence of an abnormal process. Given that a fake document has been presented as genuine, all "normal" processes must now be regarded as within doubt.
If everything is on the up and up, why are they trying to fool us with this fake document?
If someone can find proof of delayed registration of the birth, that would be big.
Again, the shoe is on the wrong foot. It ought not be the duty of the American people to prove a candidate is fake, it ought to be the duty of the candidate to prove himself genuine.