The only proof for your assertions is a document that has been demonstrated to be fake. (And clearly so in my opinion.)
Here’s the only “paperwork.” When an expectant mother checks in to the hospital a Certificate of Live Birth is generated with a pre-stamped registration number. After the child is born, the attending physician and the mother sign the Certificate of Live Birth and it goes to a Local Registrar who stamps it and signs it. Verna K.L. Lee who was the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate is still alive and living in a nursing home.
The normal process does not preclude the occurrence of an abnormal process. Given that a fake document has been presented as genuine, all "normal" processes must now be regarded as within doubt.
If everything is on the up and up, why are they trying to fool us with this fake document?
If someone can find proof of delayed registration of the birth, that would be big.
Again, the shoe is on the wrong foot. It ought not be the duty of the American people to prove a candidate is fake, it ought to be the duty of the candidate to prove himself genuine.
If its fake, then years ago someone should have been able to prove it in a court of law, before a committee of Congress or a committee of any state’s legislature.
Forgery is a crime. Document tampering is a crime. Identity theft is a crime.
Using false identity documents is a crime.
With criminal investigations come subpoenas, depositions, discovery, hearings, grand juries and the threat of perjury hanging over people’s heads.
Until then, all you have is an allegation.
Has anyone ever seen a live full newspaper of that date. None, as far as I know, has ever been discovered. Instead, all have is the same exact picture, used in every place, that is supposed to confirm the newspaper. All I see is a potential photoshop.