It was the administration of Governor Linda Lingle and Dr. Fukino as Director of the Department of Health who confirmed the authenticity of Obama’s official Hawaii birth certificate 3 years before Loretta Fuddy became director.
CNN interview with Dr. Fukino on Obama birth certificate authenticity.
http://youtu.be/e9D4n6_Uifk
Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution (Article IV, Section 1) public records are a states’ right issue.
“Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, RECORDS, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.”
As long as Hawaii stands by the birth certificate, which they have consistently done since October 31, 2008, it gets “full faith and credit.”
Congress’ codification of “full faith and credit” involves states recognizing other states’ official records WHEN THEY ARE PROPERLY CERTIFIED. That’s why it is so damning that Onaka wouldn’t certify the verifications. Those documents are totally worthless with mismatched signature and seal (Onaka’s signature and Fuddy’s seal).
That is, they would be worthless except for their negative value. Because they are NOT legal verifications of the submitted birth facts and legal verification is required when claims submitted for verification match the information found on a VALID vital record, they are verification that the submitted birth facts do NOT match the claims on a valid birth certificate.
And in a court of law, evidence of bad faith on the part of government officials OVERTURNS the presumption of regularity. Full faith and credit is NOT given to records that are found to be fraudulent.
That’s why the sheathing on the wiring on my husband’s van was removed the day after I was put into contact with Lakin’s team. My evidence of HDOH tampering with their records would have overcome the presumption of regularity; the HDOH records would no longer be presumed to be in good faith. The original records themselves would have to be inspected to find out what information from the HDOH is credible.
And that is why Arpaio says the microfilms need to be inspected. The HDOH itself has proven its non-credibility.