Sheriff's investigation finds Obama birth certificate 'fake'

World Net Daily ^ | 15 December 2016 | Bob Unruh

[The_Media_never_lie]

And fewer and fewer Americans give a flying **** what the MSM says. That’s why they are freaking out mightily, laying off staff etcetc. They’re becoming irrelevant.

---

It is not happening fast enough. I cannot wait until the MSM is obsolete.

[Fantasywriter]

It’s amazing to see the death grip you have on that birth certificate. It’s as if you’re at sea, no land in sight, and the BC is a life preserver. You will never give it up. For you, it will always be the genuine, bona fide vault copy—the one eyewitnesses previously described as handwritten—that proves your hero is honest and trustworthy.

It’s sad and sobering to watch this play out. I’m sincerely sorry that you are so invested in believing a pathological liar. That never ends well.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

The man is a liar and an idiot. Nothing he says can be taken as proof of anything.

Well, he said he was born in Hawaii.

[Beautiful_Gracious_Skies]

I never scrutinized the BC because I assumed it was fake from the start or did not belong to him.

The investigators that posted here and others from Hawaii have confirmed IMO, that the whole thing is one elaborate hoax. Investigators of news source archives in multiple locations in the US and vital records confirm so many discrepancies and inconsistencies.

Here’s what is known to be true:

1. While his image was altered in the Harvard Law photo, he did attend Harvard Law and was mysteriously boosted to be editor of their law review - as the first black to do so. Which is another falsehood since another black man had previously been president of the HLR. Problem solved, they changed the title from president to editor to pave the way. He wrote absolutely nothing while serving in that position and was documented as the focal point in a Harvard protest demonstration.

2. He had transfered his junior year to Columbia U. (College) and is listed as a graduate who did not make the honor roll. No one verifies his physical presence at the school including the department head professor for his major- PoliSci. As a candidate, he shunned the alumni association ignoring a potentially lucrative pool of millions of dollars in liberal donations. He’s not found in the alumni magazines, all photos in which he may have been featured were deliberately cut out from those archives.

3. He was enrolled and attended full- time at Occidental College near LA. There are photographs of his presence and film of his entrance to the school, not positive as to whom was responsible or why they bothered to specifically document his presence.

Prior to that, it’s unclear exactly whom graduated from PHS. It remains a mystery. The graduation film and corresponding documentation and photos have been altered.

[Bellflower]

There is a conspiracy theory that at some point in the past a real Obama’s identity was taken over by this false Obama. Not sure when, as it’s been a long time since I perused the article. It has to do with a half sister who died when she was to see him. Some things she said she remembered about him didn’t line up with the current BO.

[Nero Germanicus]

1) The title of the position held by Obama at the Harvard Law Review was “President of Volume.” Obama was President of Volume #104. All law students who work on the Law Review are “editors.”
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/choice2008/obama/harvard.html
2) Transfer students are not elgible for Latin Academic Honors at Columbia.
BARACK OBAMA ARTICLE 1983: “Breaking the War Mentality”
https://www.scribd.com/book/94924645
3) Obama was profiled twice in the Columbia Alumni magazine:
http://www.college.columbia.edu/cct_archive/jan05/cover.php
https://www.college.columbia.edu/cct/archive/jan_feb09/alumni_corner

[Fantasywriter]

You have no idea...

[Fractal Trader]

Here are a few followup YouTube videos:

Arpaio Zullo Press Conference

Zullo and Gallups on Hagman and Hagman Report

Additionally, Zullo was on Freedom Friday with Carl Gallups today, but I can't yet find a working link. I am confident to say that the Hagman and Hagman Report covered the same ground as Freedom Friday, and probably in greater detail, as it was a two hour segment, I believe.

[Nero Germanicus]

Wow! Invasion of the body snatchers.

[LucyT]

Ping to # 250 , and then see # 247.

Good memory Bellflower, the half-sister (or step-sister/adopted sister) was Lia.

[Seizethecarp]

Ping to links to Arpaio and Zullo press follow-up press conference and also link to Zullo and Gallups on Hagman Report

Hat tip to Fractal Trader!

[TheCipher]

Not sure if this has been posted yet, but here is a link to the actual video that they presented ( it is clearer to see than that in the presentation ):

Video

[Seizethecarp]

Ping to link to Arpaio’s actual presentation presser video so you can clearly see the evidence...

Thanks to TheCipher for the link.

[ml/nj]

The word Oahu on Obama’s, the O was almost in superscript. The supposed source document was much closer in alignment. Yet they say they are exact matches.

Excellent observation!

I am one who has posted here on FR about the fraudulent nature of the supposed Obama long-form BC almost immediately after it was proffered. (E.g. here) I continue to believe that image is bogus.

So the question really is: What is Arpaio up to? Who or what are his Italy and Hawaii document examiners? What about Corsi? Are these people part of a disinformation hoax, not too different from those who offered us tales about Vince Foster's day trips to Switzerland.

ML/NJ

[ml/nj]

Saw your post while skimming this thread. You say you "examined other dictionaries," but apparently not the Oxford English Dictionary which is more accurately a history of the usage of words in the English language than it is a dictionary. You should look at my thread: On Constitutional Eligibility.

While it doesn't consider what the OED has to say about the word citizen, I just looked and the OED broadens the definition specifically for the US. They do give Johnson's definition first, but the second they give the broader US definition with the first usage example from 1538.

ML/NJ

[DiogenesLamp]

Saw your post while skimming this thread. You say you "examined other dictionaries," but apparently not the Oxford English Dictionary which is more accurately a history of the usage of words in the English language than it is a dictionary. You should look at my thread: On Constitutional Eligibility.

I looked at your thread. Indeed, I had responded to it back in January. I am commenter number 5. I didn't see a definition for the word "Citizen" in there anywhere. Do you have a link to the Oxford dictionary prior to 1770 so that we can see how they defined the word "Citizen" back in 1770? (Before Vattel's influence could have any effect.)

[DiogenesLamp]

Right. Call it something else because a "sovereign individual" was anything but a "subject".

As they gave up the word "subject" so too did they give up the character of a subject, including the concept of jus soli which is monarchical/feudal in it's nature.

I get that. But disagree with you. There is no reason to believe they borrowed this usage from Vattel because it's not apparent they borrowed anything else.

If it is not apparent to you, it is because you haven't been made aware of all the connections between Vattel and the creation of the United States. Vattel was the trigger that kicked the whole thing off. His book is what inspired James Otis to initiate the American revolution.

No one else at that time was writing about uniting states to form a Confederated Republic. His book advanced the idea and the colonists made it happen.

Beyond that, many ideas which were written into the Declaration, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights had their origin in Vattel's "Law of Nations."

[DiogenesLamp]

An Obama political strategy from the beginning of his first campaign in 2007 until today is to “leak” easily disproven disinformation to key operatives in the mainstream media and then quickly “disprove” their own leaked disinformation. It has worked like a charm for nine, going on ten years. Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals advocates this, particularly when the disinformation can embarrass or humiliate your opponents.

While there may be some truth in this, the media was going to do it anyway because discrediting the political party they hate is a major focus for them. Witness now how they are attempting every means of which they can think to undermine and deligetimize Trump's election.

I keep telling people, we need to turn our mightiest guns toward's the destruction of these people who attempt to control the news, and not stop raining destruction on them until they are unable to continue spreading their biased propaganda.

The media coverage of this business with Obama's legitimacy never had anything to do with what was real or provable, it had to do with defending the legitimacy of this unAmerican bastard.

It was entirely political in nature and had nothing at all to do with integrity or truth.