Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge schedules hearing for Green Party's Pennsylvania recount push
Philly.com ^ | 12/6/2016 | Jeremy Roebuck

Posted on 12/06/2016 3:06:18 PM PST by dirtboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: dirtboy

....a liberal lawyer friend who thinks Jill Stein is a flaming idiot....

EVERYONE who knows about Jill Stein, or has seen her ranting videos, knows that she is a flaming idiot!!!!

Because of her “escalating” this fiasco to the Federal level, Stein got to stage a “press conference” in front of Trump Tower. Even though very few people bothered to watch the videos of the “press conference”, Stein has had her “reward”. Besides that, what recount has been done so far has exposed the massive fraud by the Dims in Philly!

Stein should therefore be content to cease and desist from her nonsense, especially after the judge rules against her!!!!


41 posted on 12/06/2016 7:06:30 PM PST by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
This from the linked article: "Common Pleas Judge Abbe Fletman is expected to rule on Stein's request sometime this week."

Judge Diamond is the one who ordered the hearing to take place, but the judge presiding over this hearing is an open lesbian named Abbe Fletman. Will this decision be made according to the rule of law or decided by her "feelings" about Trump?

http://www.phillymag.com/g-philly/2015/05/20/lesbian-judge-abbe-fletman-wins-court-of-common-pleas-race

42 posted on 12/06/2016 7:39:27 PM PST by manovark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manovark

If she requires a recount, it cannot be completed in time. Will PA then lose its electoral votes?

What a mess. Thanks to Al Gore and Hillary Clinton.


43 posted on 12/06/2016 8:22:08 PM PST by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Liberal judges don’t have to listen to law or reason.


44 posted on 12/06/2016 8:24:44 PM PST by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing

>>That kind of logic is usually associated with the Art Bell show, not a legal brief. <<
ROFL!


45 posted on 12/06/2016 9:42:46 PM PST by EliRoom8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: djpg

What next? We know how she will rule in the case.


46 posted on 12/06/2016 10:12:05 PM PST by chuckb87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Anybody know of this Paul Diamond, the judge?


47 posted on 12/07/2016 12:34:09 AM PST by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckb87

Whatever her ruling is, it will be appealed. The decision will depend upon how many loonies and how many reasonable people are on the appeals court. If Stein loses at that level, she will appeal to SCOTUS where anything can happen.


48 posted on 12/07/2016 4:17:10 AM PST by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

——The end is in sight.——

Well perhaps there is no real end. Perhaps the result was known from the beginning and an overturn was never expected.

Always asked but never answered is why?

My conclusion, an answer, is the current process is actually an exercise to probe the legal defense of the state to nail down the precedent of the legal process. For example, from the Gore debacle there is a legal record in Florida, a set of precedents, that might be used to exploit the Florida system and legal process by developing and introducing fraud that is acceptable or slips through the precedent in a very close election.

The other important states are being processed to develop precedents that can be studied such that critical precincts can be established to introduce fraud. The current recount is not about the 2016 election, but future elections.

Things are never as they seem


49 posted on 12/07/2016 4:30:17 AM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Macroagression melts snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manovark

Judge Diamond is a Federal Judge ruling on Stein’s Federal suit in Federal Court...

Common Pleas is a State Court most likely hearing another suit on the State level...

I can guarantee you as a former Fed Criminal Investigator, Federal Judges do not turn their courtrooms over to State judges...


50 posted on 12/07/2016 7:53:03 AM PST by East Tennessee Redhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson