Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge schedules hearing for Green Party's Pennsylvania recount push
Philly.com ^ | 12/6/2016 | Jeremy Roebuck

Posted on 12/06/2016 3:06:18 PM PST by dirtboy

The Green Party-backed push for a recount of Pennsylvania's presidential election results will get its day in federal court.

U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond on Tuesday ordered a Friday hearing to consider the party's request for a forensic examination of voting machines used across the state and a statewide recount of paper ballots.

The proceeding will take place just five days before the Dec. 13 federal deadline for the state to certify its votes, raising questions over whether that would leave enough time for a thorough examination should the judge allow the recount to proceed.

Former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has spearheaded the recount effort in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin - Rust Belt states that provided crucial and narrow victories to President-elect Donald Trump on his march to the White House.

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: clinton; election; hillary; jillstein; pauldiamond; pennsylvania; recount; soros; stein; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
The end is in sight. No way this gets the green light. And that isn't just my opinion, but that of a liberal lawyer friend who thinks Jill Stein is a flaming idiot.
1 posted on 12/06/2016 3:06:18 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

December 9th is five days before December 13th?


2 posted on 12/06/2016 3:08:04 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Stein wants a recount from here to eternity.

Diamond should tell her to STFU and go home.


3 posted on 12/06/2016 3:08:22 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Inquirer math.


4 posted on 12/06/2016 3:10:25 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
And who would do the forensic computer examination... Hillary's computer guys?
5 posted on 12/06/2016 3:11:10 PM PST by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Judge should just rule that feds have no jurisdiction per the constitution.


6 posted on 12/06/2016 3:11:23 PM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

These people really do want another Florida 2000 fiasco, don’t they? They must not realize how very, very little patience the rest of us have with doing that s*** again...


7 posted on 12/06/2016 3:11:46 PM PST by Texan5 (`"You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to drive a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Using the inclusive method of reckoning: 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 being five days, fractions counted as a full day.


8 posted on 12/06/2016 3:12:37 PM PST by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

Jill Stein lacks standing as she is not properly aggrieved, nor has she exhausted all appropriate avenues of redress at the state level.


9 posted on 12/06/2016 3:13:49 PM PST by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

There is no provision in PA law for a forensic exam. And to get a recount you have to make a prima facie case that something actually happened - and Jill Stein has publicly admitted they have no such evidence. Which IMO is the reason she dropped the PA state-level suit, and is pursuing this approach at the federal level.


10 posted on 12/06/2016 3:14:43 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Aggrieved is not part of the PA legal language, that is MI. She is basically asking the federal court to re-write PA law by requiring a forensic exam which is nowhere to be found in PA election law. This is DOA.


11 posted on 12/06/2016 3:16:15 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

By him saying today, that he will hear a case, that is extremely time sensitive, in three days tells us how he’s gonna rule.
Pennsylvania is locked down.


12 posted on 12/06/2016 3:16:57 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

If he’s the judge hearing the case on Friday, he’s a Bush appointee.


13 posted on 12/06/2016 3:17:38 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

Jills so-called experts....


14 posted on 12/06/2016 3:18:12 PM PST by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

At least the judge is a Bush appointee, not a Clinton crony,


15 posted on 12/06/2016 3:19:49 PM PST by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

Hillary’s email server guy

haha

what joke that group is


16 posted on 12/06/2016 3:20:41 PM PST by arl295
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Alternatively just one full business day


17 posted on 12/06/2016 3:22:17 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Does this bitch Stein think she can actually win for Hillary or is she just filling her bank account?

And does she have any idea of the consequences if she pulls off this coup for Hillary?!


18 posted on 12/06/2016 3:24:01 PM PST by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

“And who would do the forensic computer examination... Hillary’s computer guys?”

Very funny, except it could be true.


19 posted on 12/06/2016 3:24:16 PM PST by ChessExpert (It's not compassion when you use government to give other people's money away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
He has to hear it. And then he has to deny it. Then she has to appeal to the Third Circuit OR appeal for cert to SCOTUS. That's Alito's assignment lol.


20 posted on 12/06/2016 3:24:57 PM PST by StAnDeliver (Protocol: "President Trump"; subsequent references "The President" or "Pres. Trump". NO "POTUS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson