Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76
She finally has something legitimate.

I have to agree, unfortunately.

23 posted on 12/06/2016 10:11:04 AM PST by CedarDave (Proud member of Hillary's Deplorables class of 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: CedarDave

Disagree completely.


35 posted on 12/06/2016 10:16:46 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: CedarDave
She finally has something legitimate. I have to agree, unfortunately.

"Shirley" you jest....she is a nutcase.

79 posted on 12/06/2016 11:31:19 AM PST by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVERALL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: CedarDave

I don’t think so. They aren’t on a short list of 3. They are on a lengthy list of possible judges that Trump put together well before the convention. This was his list as a candidate in response to people who were voting based just on the SCOTUS alone. He has made no such list public as president elect. Furthermore the MI Supreme Court has not decided to even take the case yet.


85 posted on 12/06/2016 12:37:57 PM PST by katielou828
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson