The reality:
Posted on 12/06/2016 3:54:56 AM PST by SJackson
Just when you think she cannot sink any lower, she finds a way.
Transcript:
Well, as I write this, the Clinton campaign has decided to join in the three-state election re-count launched by Jill Stein, who, like all communists, is eager to raise a lot of money – around seven million dollars, so far. That means that Jill Stein has raised twice as much money to RECOUNT votes as she did trying to get them in the first place.
Now of course, any ADDITIONAL money raised by Jill Stein she gets to keep; my guess is that will result in a few VERY well-paying jobs to keep these socialists rolling in the cash they didn’t earn.
This kind of petty money-grubbing and grandstanding is the left wing doing what it does best: childishly running around stomping and screaming for attention at a dinner party for intended for adults.
So why did Hillary Clinton decided to attach her name, her campaign’s name, and the Democratic party brand to this foolishness. Why?
Democrats call always be counted on to find a few hundred “missing” votes somewhere, but Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania were won by significant margins and Hillary needs to overturn all three in order to crawl back into the Presidency. That’s not going to happen, and everybody knows it. So why is she battering the already-ruined Democrat party with this nonsense?
. Well, the recount will not change the RESULTS of the election, but it could change HOW Donald Trump gets elected. It’s a longshot, but If the recount ties up the electoral votes of these three states when the electoral college meets in mid-December, then neither Trump nor Clinton will have the necessary 270 electoral votes needed to become President. Under such a scenario, the decision would fall on the Republican-majority House of Representatives, who would immediately vote to elect Donald Trump.
WHY?
So that Democrats will be able to claim that “neither of them” had the magic 270; that Hillary won the popular vote by about two million people; and that Donald Trump was not ELECTED but SELECTED. They mean to do to Trump what they did to George W. Bush: DE-LEGITIMIZE him before he even takes office.
Donald Trump was exceptionally generous to Hillary Clinton after she conceded; Trump was magnanimous, he was kind… he was PRESIDENTIAL.
Because as it turns out, the only two politicians to not “accept the results of an election” are Democrat Al Gore in 2000, and now Democrat Hillary Clinton seems to think that she can throw in the towel, stop the fight, retire to her corner, sit on the stool, stop the bleeding, eat a sandwich, and then, a half hour later, walk up to the winner sitting at ease with his happy and proud family and smash him in the head with a chair. That’s the kind of honor you find among these progressive thieves.
Well, get used to it, America. If you think cocaine-snorting Hollywood celebrities, backroom Washington corruption mongers and metrosexual New York aristocrats are going to let themselves be embarrassed by the stupid, racist, hateful, woman-hating American people, you have another think coming.
See this row of buses behind me? The city is Chicago, the scene of one of the largest, most violent and lawless, anti-Trump protests. Why are these buses here? Because someone PAID THEM TO BE HERE, that’s why, and the same people paid for the mob that filled all of these buses; paid them to smash buildings and smash young women; paid them to rip up Trump signs as well as rip up the fabric of our society; paid them to be a violent private army to convince the American people that it was the TRUMP supporters who were vicious and destructive. And we have the emails to prove it.
When it was announced that Hillary Clinton was not going to come out and comfort and console her followers but instead LITERALLY left them standing out in the cold I shouted COWARD! at the TV screen. The concession speech is a ritual, an important ritual, but in place of that grace, that closure, her tearful followers got a surly Jon Podesta, speaking for Hillary, claiming that some states were too close to call; that the election was still in play; that they should just go home heartbroken while meanwhile, their psychopathic idol was calling to concede in between fits of screaming, cursing and smashing things. The miserable, gutless COWARDS.
This is your final disgrace, Hillary. Go home. Take that rapist husband of yours, and your entitled, unpleasant, talent-free daughter with you. The three of you just go away and pray to God you do not get what you deserve. Drag your Saudi terrorism money, your Goldman-Sachs, “private-position” millions and that utterly corrupt, treasonous carcass off the stage and just fade away: a small, small person, getting tinier in front of our eyes. Go home and stay home, while the rest of America sits down and tries to stop shaking from the whizzing sound of that bullet we just dodged.
This little vanity is very close to exactly how I feel about this election and its results.
I find myself pondering about those Republicans-who-are-Democrats in Congress and who they will support when they get to put their two cents in and cast their ballots.
If they want the USA to become a member of the EU but called the United Globalist Party, a jihadist nation of rape and murder and massive killings as is occurring in Europe, then I know how they will vote.
And I know what I will do.
We dodged a bullet indeed. But if anyone thinks these people are going to gracefully accept, well, I’ve got a nice bridge or sale.
L
Whittle is wrong here. Surprising to see him so off on this as he’s usually spot on about most other things.
> “Well, the recount will not change the RESULTS of the election, but it could change HOW Donald Trump gets elected. It’s a longshot, but If the recount ties up the electoral votes of these three states when the electoral college meets in mid-December, then neither Trump nor Clinton will have the necessary 270 electoral votes needed to become President.”
The Constitution is clear that it is the ***majority of Electoral votes cast***, not necessarily 270. If all states and the District of Columbia cast their electoral votes, then the majority threshold is 270.
If MI, WI, PA are all tied up in Stein/Clinton shenanigans, then their electoral votes are deleted from the total and there is another majority threshold to reach. The good news is Trump crosses this other majority threshold (do the arithmetic).
The only way Clinton can get to the White House is to flip two of the states and stop the remaining one from casting its electoral votes or flip all three of the states. It’s not going to happen, at least not legally.
> “Under such a scenario, the decision would fall on the Republican-majority House of Representatives, who would immediately vote to elect Donald Trump.”
Not quite. If Electors from a state cast two ***sets of votes that are conflicting*** (as has happened in history and is why there exists a constitutional amendment provision), then if that state’s electoral votes matter to the outcome of the election, then the House votes but only 1 vote per delegation.
I recommend watching it. I am a huge admirer of Bill Whittle, and have donated to him. I think he is a preeminent conservative spokesman today, and his style, content, and delivery is superb.
The Clintons are a bottomless pit of depravity.
The reality:
Nice!
“Clinton seems to think that she can throw in the towel, stop the fight, retire to her corner, sit on the stool, stop the bleeding”
I guess she has another thought coming
If we only realized how desperate and panic stricken she is at the thought of the vengeance that may be wreaked upon her once Trump has well and truly won and all her shenannigans and recounts have failed. Will all her mega-donors give her a pass? Will the incoming DOJ?
Trump could carry all 50 states with 90% of the total vote in each one, and the Left still wouldn’t accept him as president.
That’s just a reality.
“Will the incoming DOJ?”
I want the hag, her rapist husband and the baby grifter put in irons. I want their belongings seized by the government as ill gotten gains.
Hillary might be thinking that, if SHE can’t have the Presidency, at least she can deny it to Trump.
This is the plan:
1) Use the recounts to delay the vote being certified in WI, MI, and PA by the Dec 19 deadline, to reduce Trump’s margin.
2) Have “faithless” #NeverTrump electors vote for some “moderate”, like Kasich, so that nobody gets 270, and the election gets thrown to the House.
3) The House gets to pick from the top THREE electoral vote getters. The Dems join with the RINOs to vote for Kasich.
4) Kasich becomes president.
5) The Establishment tries to ride out the storm.
Clinton, and Obama so co-opted the DNC into their personal orbit that it is only the face of the party we see or hear. The party itself in the case of Hillary required replacing the chairman (several times leading to Brazil), and subjecting the national party to the Candidate herself. Thus it is troubling so see there is no DNC involvement but rather the failed candidate still holding the reins of power for democrats.
Thanks for posting. I love to listen to his commentaries. He’s too “tell it like it is” for the major TV news channels, but he’s so articulate, seems he should have a radio show, IMO.
Incorrect. See 12th Amendment:
The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;—The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;—The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President.Each elector gets to vote for President and VP, but there is no requirement that all the electors of a state vote for the same person.
There it is - 1000 words worth...
“put in irons”
Seeing them do the “perp walk” in their chains would be the cherry on top of that sundae.
Yes...that’s the bottom line.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.