[SeekAndFind]

The Wisconsin Election Commission also reported the following on Day 4 of the recount:

“These are the explanations provided by the clerks for difference in numbers between canvass and the recount:

Dane County: 12 Absentee ballots were left in their certificate envelopes, unopened, on Election Night, for City of Monona Wards 6-10. Ballots were opened and canvased by the board during the recount.

Fond Du Lac County: 13 absentee envelopes were missing from Election Night and 1 absentee ballot counted on Election Night was rejected during recount canvassing of Town of Fond Du Lac Wards 1-8. A draw-down was done resulting in a loss of 7 votes for Trump/Pence and a loss of 7 votes for Clinton/Kaine.

Grant County: Village of Woodman and Village of Livingston removed from Day 4 results pending verification of recount numbers by Grant County Board of Canvas.

Racine County: Increase of 13 votes for Clinton/Kaine, votes were not counted on Election Night due to non-standard pens used to mark ballots.”

[bigbob]

Or you can skip “Heavy” and go directly to the Wisconsin Election Commission data, which is where they’re getting their information from: (spreadsheet)

http://elections.wi.gov/elections-voting/recount

[LibFreeUSA]

If they actualyl checked and verified the “Citizenship” of all voters who “voted”, TRUMP’s lead would increase even more significantly.

[sharkhawk]

Never saw this Heavy site before the election, they are doing the best job I’ve seen on the recounts.

[SamAdams76]

As an FYI, when Wisconsin finishes the recount and certifies the election for Trump (again), MI and PA will no longer matter. Jill and Hill are just wasting other people's money (something they are very good at).

Not that I think anything will happen with MI or PA but WI will guarantee 270 EVs all by itself.

I'm not sure why the concern trolls are so worried about this recounting. If any of those states flipped in a recount, it would be historic and it would cast doubt on the integrity our our entire election system.

Now I have no doubt that voting fraud occurs but it occurs in the voting phase, not the vote counting phase.

Once Trump is sworn in, I suspect he will work with the states to tighten up our voting process in the following ways:

• ID required at the voting booth to verify name and current address
• Voting rolls purged of the deceased and those who no longer live in the precinct. (This would require re-registering every election cycle but this can be done online).
• No illegals allowed to vote under any circumstance (of course we expect the majority of them to be deported under Trump)
• No more "early" voting
• Absentee ballots only for a valid reason (i.e. military service, hospitalization, business travel).

I can think of other ways to tighten things up but that's a good start.

A lot of the other vote fraud (like ballot stuffing) would be prevented if we just tighten up the process on the voting side. For example, by not requiring ID, it is too easy to vote on behalf of somebody else.

[Mechanicos]

Don’t get any hopes up. Democrats know they only need mass fraud in the largest counties to win a state. They do such with paper ballots and back room filling them out.

Absentee, Motor voter and under votes are ripe for the fraud. Need People in every major county inside and watching to prevent this.

[Carl Vehse]

Are there any states Trump barely lost? Maybe the votes in those states should be recounted. (It is to be expected that any election cheating was done by Demonicrats.) Piling on Trump electoral votes can’t hurt.

[fortheDeclaration]

Stein will ask for another recount.

[Homer1]

Is Milwaukee waiting for everybody else to see what margin they need to make up?

[StAnDeliver]

If I were President Trump, I would take this silly recount fracas and use it as cover to appoint Attila The Hun as SoS.

Every day this is top of the news cycle, appoint someone who would otherwise be opposed to the second. Franklin Graham as Czar of American Religious Liberties.

[Magnum44]

While the results are summarized as good news, the numbers do not relieve my concerns about the integrity of the system:

Trump gained 356 votes

Trump lost 246 votes

Trump net gain on day 4: 110 votes

So is this saying 356 votes got switched from non-Trump to Trump? and another 246 got switched from Trump to non-Trump? That would be changing 602 votes...The process seems like it should not have that much slop. How could it be so error prone? The ballot should be very objective, not subjective.

[Amish with an attitude]

Wow, this is turning out to be a total waste of resources, but I guess that’s one of the things libs are well known for.

[entropy12]

HAHAHAHA if Trump retains WI, and assume he loses both PA & MI in recount (PA highly unlikely), the result: TRUMP 270, Hillary 268!