[SamAdams76]

As an FYI, when Wisconsin finishes the recount and certifies the election for Trump (again), MI and PA will no longer matter. Jill and Hill are just wasting other people's money (something they are very good at).

Not that I think anything will happen with MI or PA but WI will guarantee 270 EVs all by itself.

I'm not sure why the concern trolls are so worried about this recounting. If any of those states flipped in a recount, it would be historic and it would cast doubt on the integrity our our entire election system.

Now I have no doubt that voting fraud occurs but it occurs in the voting phase, not the vote counting phase.

Once Trump is sworn in, I suspect he will work with the states to tighten up our voting process in the following ways:

• ID required at the voting booth to verify name and current address
• Voting rolls purged of the deceased and those who no longer live in the precinct. (This would require re-registering every election cycle but this can be done online).
• No illegals allowed to vote under any circumstance (of course we expect the majority of them to be deported under Trump)
• No more "early" voting
• Absentee ballots only for a valid reason (i.e. military service, hospitalization, business travel).

I can think of other ways to tighten things up but that's a good start.

A lot of the other vote fraud (like ballot stuffing) would be prevented if we just tighten up the process on the voting side. For example, by not requiring ID, it is too easy to vote on behalf of somebody else.

[pfflier]

I'm not sure why the concern trolls are so worried about this recounting.

Experience. The dims always gain in recounts. Watch Michigan, although it may be irrelevant.

I also think the dims will find a way to take the Wisconsin recount into the federal court system. They have no shame.

BTW I am not a "concern troll". I am a pragmatist watching this kind of stuff since the 1950s.

[DugwayDuke]

SamAdams76 wrote: “I’m not sure why the concern trolls are so worried about this recounting.”

You’re correct in believing it won’t affect the results. However, if the liberals can remove Trump electoral votes, we won’t hear the end of it. Instead of Trump winning a landslide, it will be Trump just barely won, etc.

[az_gila]

Add into your list of reforms...

* No third party paid registration (aka ACORN, etc)

* No hand collecting of absentee votes for delivery

[Centurion2000]

I can think of other ways to tighten things up but that's a good start.

Purple thumb dip to stop double/triple voting.

[rxsid]

"•No illegals allowed to vote under any circumstance (of course we expect the majority of them to be deported under Trump)"

Not only should illegals not be allowed to vote, but ANY foreigner here (or abroad) should be allowed to vote in our elections...regardless of immigration status.

In other words, for those in Rio Linda...only CITIZENS of this country should be allowed to vote.

[Agrarian]

The trouble with a recount is that the Dems know exactly how many votes they need to come up with.

[entropy12]

I do not think the US Constitution says 270 EV’s needed. Because at the time it was written there were fewer states. All that is needed is simple majority of total EV’s accepted.

SO why does it matter if WI. Mi & PA do not finish the recount in time?