Replies

Good Catch on Walworth, LaGrange, Ward 1-3. That seems whacked also.
The state mentioned Walworth,Whitewater but nothing about Lagrange.
I'll take LaGrange out and it further adjusts as such:

Trump" +75
Hillary: +47

Re: IOWA County - I note it in my post.

I just noticed Iowa County,VILLAGE OF AVOCA, Ward 1 has a huge discrepancy, so I am modifying my preliminary results, by leaving their totals out."

I notified Wisc. via email they had some whacked day2 results and they got it fixed in day 3. Whether it's because of my email or not, who knows.

I didn't email 'em about Iowa County, and I wont for Walworth, so we'll see if they fix it with tomorrow's results.

We don’t care about this anymore, but I’m still playin with the numbers.

It looks like they cleaned up the whacked counts from yesterday.

Day 4 results(Near as I can figure).

Trump: +110
Hillary: +37

The above totals do not contain any Milwaukee County numbers. Milwaukee County counts do not reflect absentee ballot counts - most of the individual ward recount numbers are way off from the original counts.

Dane is a hand recount (slow walking) so results will be lagging.

Wisconsin’s spreadsheet- for the smaller towns- is broken down by county\city with all the city wards on the same line.
for the larger cities - each ward will have it’s own line.

So, there are 3636 lines with counts in the spreadsheet.
1449 lines have completed the recount, for approx. 39.8% complete.

(23 milwaukee lines with counts\recounts are complete, but I chose to leave all Milwaukee county out)