Was Hillary wins the Presidency Plan A?
Was it just an insurance policy that would only be needed if it became necessary to execute Plan B?
Posted on 11/30/2016 9:50:35 AM PST by drewh
ISAIAH 41:11-13
11”Behold, all those who are angered at you will be shamed and dishonored; Those who contend with you will be as nothing and will perish.
12”You will seek those who quarrel with you, but will not find them, Those who war with you will be as nothing and non-existent.
13”For I am the LORD your God, who upholds your right hand, Who says to you, ‘Do not fear, I will help you.’…
I’m going to have to stop looking at FR until after the Inauguration.
Every day there are stories posted like this one that make me more and more nervous.
uhh.....it’s in the CONSTITUTION!!
What exactly is their basis for filing suit?
That the Constitution is Unconstituional?
“Leaders of the effort, mainly Democrats, have plans to challenge laws in the 29 states that force electors to support their party’s candidate. Those laws have never been tested, leaving some constitutional experts to argue they’re in conflict with the founders’ intention to establish a body that can evaluate the fitness of candidates for office and vote accordingly.”
So, when did liberals become enamored of the concept of “original intent”. I thought liberals believed in the “living constitution”.
Amen!
Thank You....
I hear ya! I used to laugh at their stupidity, and pray for their salvation, but now they are interfering in mine and our kids future of Freedom!
The question here is not to what extent will the left go to undermine the Constitution, but how far can those who still believe in the Constitution and the rule of law be pushed?
Was Hillary wins the Presidency Plan A?
Was it just an insurance policy that would only be needed if it became necessary to execute Plan B?
Congress and the states simply will not amend the Electoral College out of existence. It’s a complete non-starter. And I would say the same about any attempt to modify how it works. It would have to be a constitutional amendment. No way it would make it through the process. The state governments are 3 out of 5 Republican-controlled. And most states realize they have a vested interest in the status quo.
These thugs want to remove the law which in reality protects both the voters and the electors from criminal intimidation. So then why should these thugs be protected by law?
With all this in mind, it's hard to tell what the founders would think of what we have today.
At least now, if the candidate decides to murder his entire family on live TV after being elected, we have a way for to get avoid putting him in office.
This has nothing to do with the electoral vote. He would be subject to criminal prosecution under the laws of the state where this occurred.
You really can not fix stupid.
The issue is never the issue. The issue is the Revolution.
The feds have no legal authority over the states’ management of their own electors.
At least that’s the way I see it.
>>SCOTUS already upheld laws that bind electors.
Laws?
It is for our benefit that the brainworks of the farm eat all the apples, drink all the milk/whiskey, and sleep in beds, WIF SHEETS!
{ que progressive national anthem }
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-O_(The_Banana_Boat_Song)
THey really want a Revolution II don’t they! Amazing how far they’ll go to destroy America!
Shhh...don't tell them, it'll keep them out of trouble.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.