Replies

The reason Stein wants a ‘hand recount’ in WI is likely the same as why she wants it in MI.

She and her lawyers have found there were 85,000 ballots in MI that were voted but there was no vote for the Office of President. In other words, as we would expect, there were people that decided not to vote for President.

The number of cast votes in MI was about 4.8 million. So 85,000 non-President votes amount to less than 2% of those that voted.

But Stein wants to hand count those 85,000 to ‘divine’ voter intent. She wants to see if there are any marks around the oval for Hillary that would indicate the voter meant to vote for Hillary, a hanging chad type scenario.

The most damning evidence against Stein is seen in the question of why she chose WI, MI, PA which are states that Clinton lost and not states that Trump lost by smaller margins such as NH. Stein was asked this question several times and she ignored it, refusing to answer. So she’s working for Clinton, why? Because Fidel Castro wanted Clinton and Stein is a Castro worshipper (it’s true; she’s got a screw loose about Cuba and Castro).

Here’s a list of the 10 closest 2016 states ranked from narrowest margin by percentage to widest:

1. Michigan 0.3 percent
Trump 47.6 percent, Clinton 47.3 percent
Difference: 13,080 votes

2. New Hampshire 0.4 percent
Clinton 47.6 percent, Trump 47.2 percent
Difference: 2,701 votes

3. Wisconsin 1 percent
Trump 47.9 percent, Clinton 46.9 percent
Difference: 27,257 votes

4. Pennsylvania 1.2 percent
Trump 48.8 percent, Clinton 47.6 percent
Difference: 68,236 votes (99 percent reporting)

5. Florida 1.2 percent
Trump 49 percent, Clinton 47.8 percent
Difference: 114,455 votes

6. Minnesota 1.5 percent
Clinton 46.4 percent, Trump 44.9 percent
Difference: 44,470 votes

7. Nevada 2.4 percent
Clinton 47.9 percent, Trump 45.5 percent
Difference: 26,434 votes

8. Maine 2.7 percent
Clinton 47.9 percent, Trump 45.2 percent
Difference: 19,995 votes

9. North Carolina 3.8 percent
Trump 49.9 percent, Clinton 46.1 percent
Difference: 177,009 votes

10. Arizona 3.9 percent
Trump 49.3 percent, Clinton 45.4 percent
Difference: 91,682 votes

http://www.usnews.com/news/the-run-2016/articles/2016-11-14/the-10-closest-states-in-the-2016-election

This just in:

> “The data from the Exit Polls conducted by Edison Research for the National Election Pool show Mr. Che to be correct – an extremely small portion of the voting public (only 2%) told our exit pollsters they had a favorable view of both. While most voters did have a favorable view of one of the two major candidates – an astonishing 18% of the electorate told us they had an unfavorable opinion of both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. And this is the group that won the election for Trump”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3499351/posts

Let’s repeat the pertinent information in the above:

“an ***astonishing 18%*** of the electorate told us they had an unfavorable opinion of both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.”

Now contrast this exit poll information data with what Stein said in what follows here:

> “In Michigan, Trump won by 11,000 votes. But there were 85,000 ‘blank votes’ in which people voted for other races but they left the presidential race blank. That is far higher than any election in history.”

The 85,000 ‘blank votes’ for President were out of about 4.8 million votes cast in MI, so that the 85,000 represent less than 2 percent of all votes.

Stein is lying.

She’s asking for hand recounts to ‘divine the intent’ of voters that refrained from voting for any preid3ntial candidate.

While it's reasonable to cite the "most damning evidence", as you've done, Castro is not likely to have had much influence in this process, unless perhaps his surrogates were posthumously botting in $160k per night over Thanksgiving break.

But the Left is tipping its hand to lionize Fidel in a timely fashion to show us the kind of government for which they have in misty-eyed fashion yearned. As BHO took over the reins when he deemed Congress would not act, they want such a dictator to force their elitist will when the deplorables would attempt to thwart them.

In short, the circumstantial evidence shows Left is pleased (e.g, forks over more money to Jill to mount this bitch of a fight than they were willing to give her to run her pre-election campaign) to disrupt this election. Their hope was to run out the clock on recounts (with lawyerly objections) and run roughshod over the meeting date of the Electoral College ("EC"), with the likely consequence of all of one or more states' voters becoming disenfranchised. Even in overwhelmingly-likely defeat they would then further scream how the current EC process (hopefully throwing things into the House and Senate) has elected (in their terms, "a sexual predator") Donald James Trump.