But the Left is tipping its hand to lionize Fidel in a timely fashion to show us the kind of government for which they have in misty-eyed fashion yearned. As BHO took over the reins when he deemed Congress would not act, they want such a dictator to force their elitist will when the deplorables would attempt to thwart them.
In short, the circumstantial evidence shows Left is pleased (e.g, forks over more money to Jill to mount this bitch of a fight than they were willing to give her to run her pre-election campaign) to disrupt this election. Their hope was to run out the clock on recounts (with lawyerly objections) and run roughshod over the meeting date of the Electoral College ("EC"), with the likely consequence of all of one or more states' voters becoming disenfranchised. Even in overwhelmingly-likely defeat they would then further scream how the current EC process (hopefully throwing things into the House and Senate) has elected (in their terms, "a sexual predator") Donald James Trump.
HF
There is circumstantial evidence that supports a Stein-Castro-Clinton connection.
First, Stein has a worship fetish for Fidel Castro. That’s documented. It’s easy to find confirmation of this.
Second, news reports say that Fidel Castro was severely distraught when he was told Clinton had lost the election and that this news may have brought on a condition leading to his death. The evidence of this is not solid but it did not arise from any conspiracy source nor did it delve into other matters other than Fidel Castro’s reaction to the election news.
Third, the recall petition of Stein was funded substantially by Soros. The evidence of this is circumstantial but is substantial enough to draw a strong inference. Therein lies the connection to Clinton.
The missing link so far is the connection between Soros and Castro, but maybe such a link is unnecessary. Both Soros and Castro have been associated via many of the various groups they back. The Soros Group is known to be plotting between 2015 and 2018 to add 10 million progressive voters of Latino origins and to use front SJW groups to facilitate the establishment of this new voting bloc. This lines up with Castro’s subversion. Both Soros and Castro back the same types of ‘action groups’.
Stein is then doing this out of some bizarre notion that she is a revolutionary akin to a female American Fidel Castro. As a Castro acolyte, she likely knew Castro’s desire to see Clinton as President. Clinton announces she is ‘participating’ with Stein. The money has been coming from Soros. Stein chooses the blue swing states MI, WI, PA that Clinton lost and ignores the states that Trump lost where the losing margin of voters is smaller.
If Stein was doing it for money, she would also include the states that Trump barely lost. But she is certainly working now as an agent for Clinton, why? It could be a unified front against Trump but I think it is more a crazy romantic notion that she’s doing it for the legacy of Fidel Castro. Her worship of him is bizarre and disturbing.