Replies

This is a long ( minutes) but extremely fascinating interview with Judge Troupis who describes the recount process in great detail. He led the statewide recount in the Justice Prosser election several years ago in which all these procedures were developed, since there hadn't been a statewide recount in WI in over 100 years. Judge Troupis explains that WI ballot counting is decentralized and that since nothing is sent over the internet (results are called in by phone or faxed), there is ZERO percent chance for WI voting to be hacked. He also explains exactly how the recount will be done and why hand counting is unnecessary unless the Stein lawyers can prove that the machines are not reliable and that the hand count would change the outcome of the election.

This is a long clip but if you want to know FACTS rather than the noise that gets posted on the internet about the WI recount, this is where you can get them.

forgot to fill in the blank - the interview runs 30 minutes. Well worth the time, the Judge is fascinating to listen to.

The reason Stein wants a ‘hand recount’ in WI is likely the same as why she wants it in MI.

She and her lawyers have found there were 85,000 ballots in MI that were voted but there was no vote for the Office of President. In other words, as we would expect, there were people that decided not to vote for President.

The number of cast votes in MI was about 4.8 million. So 85,000 non-President votes amount to less than 2% of those that voted.

But Stein wants to hand count those 85,000 to ‘divine’ voter intent. She wants to see if there are any marks around the oval for Hillary that would indicate the voter meant to vote for Hillary, a hanging chad type scenario.

The most damning evidence against Stein is seen in the question of why she chose WI, MI, PA which are states that Clinton lost and not states that Trump lost by smaller margins such as NH. Stein was asked this question several times and she ignored it, refusing to answer. So she’s working for Clinton, why? Because Fidel Castro wanted Clinton and Stein is a Castro worshipper (it’s true; she’s got a screw loose about Cuba and Castro).

Here’s a list of the 10 closest 2016 states ranked from narrowest margin by percentage to widest:

1. Michigan 0.3 percent
Trump 47.6 percent, Clinton 47.3 percent
Difference: 13,080 votes

2. New Hampshire 0.4 percent
Clinton 47.6 percent, Trump 47.2 percent
Difference: 2,701 votes

3. Wisconsin 1 percent
Trump 47.9 percent, Clinton 46.9 percent
Difference: 27,257 votes

4. Pennsylvania 1.2 percent
Trump 48.8 percent, Clinton 47.6 percent
Difference: 68,236 votes (99 percent reporting)

5. Florida 1.2 percent
Trump 49 percent, Clinton 47.8 percent
Difference: 114,455 votes

6. Minnesota 1.5 percent
Clinton 46.4 percent, Trump 44.9 percent
Difference: 44,470 votes

7. Nevada 2.4 percent
Clinton 47.9 percent, Trump 45.5 percent
Difference: 26,434 votes

8. Maine 2.7 percent
Clinton 47.9 percent, Trump 45.2 percent
Difference: 19,995 votes

9. North Carolina 3.8 percent
Trump 49.9 percent, Clinton 46.1 percent
Difference: 177,009 votes

10. Arizona 3.9 percent
Trump 49.3 percent, Clinton 45.4 percent
Difference: 91,682 votes

http://www.usnews.com/news/the-run-2016/articles/2016-11-14/the-10-closest-states-in-the-2016-election

They are having a hearing in Wisconsin at 4:30 today not sure if it still going on now about the full hand recount and Clintons Lawyers joined it:

http://www.channel3000.com/news/politics/judge-lets-clinton-join-recount-lawsuit/42654554