Unlike Wisconsin, in Penn one must have a legitimate reason for a recount....She does not.
They need full disclosure of who is making these donations.
So what is this business with the stat guys?
They are saying the districts with voting machines voted differently than the districts with paper ballots?
I really dont understand the theory they put forth.
Without PA, a recount in WI is theater.
Hillary never had a path to the WH without PA.
Overturning a 68,000 Trump vote lead there is akin to winning the lottery.
I don’t expect they’ll be getting any help from Tom Wolf. Wolfie boy has been quaking in his boots ever since the red rural voters in his state stood-up and made themselves heard. He is in self-preservation mode. Not going near this with a 30 foot pole IMHO.
Proof is in the eye of the beholder. And, it's conjectural--only the recount can provide proof.
So, prepare for a spate of fairy-tale legal briefs and behind the scenes judge shopping. And, if that doesn't succeed (as it shouldn't) for a spate of Dem wailing about the inherent unfairness of the Electoral College, and how we need a uniform, national form of democracy, meaning a National Popular Vote for national office.
If dems are in contact with actual votes, I’m nervous.
praying for God to continue to strengthen people of our country to do what is right by Him and our laws and expose those doing the opposite.
She is asking for voters in Pa to sign and notarized affidavit saying there was fraud and the fraud is based on the findings of J. Alex Halderman. He is one of the compete scientists who was urging the Clintons to do a recount.
He does not have any proof of fraud only the polls and the news stories and also the results that showed Trump won because he says Trump could not have one. Here is the affadavit that she is asking to be filled out she wants 3 voters from each preceinct:
Read the whole paper affadvit and you will what they are asking for on the full recount including getting their hands on the machines.
If they failed to cheat enough the first time I beleive they will be able to do it now. They are asking for it not to prove fraud but to change the elections results in Clintons favor.
Has it occurred to the Democrats that in demanding a delayed recount that they may wind up DISENFRANCHISING voters in all the states where the recount can’t be completed in time and the electoral votes may not count?????? I realize Trump and Pence will still take office, thank God.
Here is Stein’s 17 minute video, calling for over 3000 volunteer residents of all the PA precincts, to submit notarized affadavits calling for a recount.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpnfdlXaY40
None of these recounts were set for frivolous recounts by candidates that got 1% of the vote
All 3 states should be thrown out
Reportedly, recounts in PA have to be approached on a county by county basis. This allows Hillary to cherry pick inner City voting districts in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, where the judiciary and local election boards are dominated by Democrats. I don’t expect Jill Stein, aka Hillary Clinton, to show interest in fraud or “integrity of the vote” anywhere else.
They don’t need real proof of anything — just enough bs to give a corrupt judge a little cover. Let’s not confuse this with a fair process. I hope they do not prevail, but like a fire, it has to be battled and snuffed immediately.
The only fraud I’ve seen are illegals and felons voting illegally and she STILL took it on the chin to the tune of over 70,000 votes! Yeah, good luck with that, doctor. Your time would be better served looking after sickly Hillary who already has one foot in the grave.
Yipee!
Does anyone really think she was raising money to cause a recount? "Despite" successful fundraising effort, recount of Pennsylvania remains unlikely. LOL. These idiots think she actually was going to use the funds for a recount.
IOW, the Green Party gets to pocket the money. PT Barnum would be jealous.