[traderrob6]

Unlike Wisconsin, in Penn one must have a legitimate reason for a recount....She does not.

[UCANSEE2]

So.... then she gets to keep the money ?

[CatOwner]

Unlike Wisconsin, in Penn one must have a legitimate reason for a recount....She does not.

Well, Trump himself said over the weekend there was rampant voter fraud in this election. How about that reason?

Playing devil's advocate for the DEMs ...

[laconic]

Through chicanery, they might be able to “find” 10,704 needed votes in Flint or Detroit, swinging Michigan; a lot less likely that they might be able to swing 22,000 votes in Wisconsin. But its an infinitessimal chance that they can steal 70,658 votes in Pennsylvania; for one thing, there are virtually no adults who didn’t vote in Philadelphia and an intense review might reveal just how much fraud was committed in that city, where Hillary got 81 percent of the votes.

[DarthVader]

She will get nowhere in all three. The push-back has begun.

[1Old Pro]

Unlike Wisconsin, in Penn one must have a legitimate reason for a recount....She does not.

You mean her "hacking" reason doesn't stand when all the voting machines are offline thus impossible to "hack".