Trust me, I’m on your side. What I’m saying, in a nutshell, is that if you want to nail the Clinton Foundation, go for the worst, most criminal, most brazenly illegal activities it engaged in. This would be stealing billions of aid/relief money, etc., from some of the poorest and most desperate countries on earth. These would not only be the easiest crimes to prove, but also the most egregious.
Again, believe me, you and I see this the same way.
I don't think so.
What I’m saying, in a nutshell, is that if you want to nail the Clinton Foundation, go for the worst, most criminal, most brazenly illegal activities it engaged in.
Wrong again. You try for that but more often than not one is forced to go after using the evidence they got or what they can get. Tiny example, see Al Capone.
I don't give a damn what or who Trump uses to obtain evidence on Clinton. And if that means using foreign governments or foreign contractors to obtain evidence, oh well.